Ae245

Rollback granted

Hi Ae245. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isaac Mabaya

The article Isaac Mabaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Jan Ke Tami (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

List of UEFA Champions League finals

Please undo that move. It was originally put through as uncontroversial when it definitely should have gone through the WP:RM process. Furthermore, the finals before 1993 were not under the UEFA Champions League name, similar to how the List of UEFA Cup and Europa League finals includes finals prior to 2010. Finally, why did you make an edit to List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finals? I can only assume it was a deliberate attempt to prevent the article from being moved back. – PeeJay 15:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I moved the page because it was unsatisfying to see the pleonasm in using two names of the same competition and it also makes it seem like they're two different competitions, which is even more unsatisfying. When I requested the technical move, someone permitted it and they didn't think it was controversial when they performed the move on my behalf. Ae245 (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Footballer categories

Hello. I think you're mistaken about only including players in a club category if they played at senior level. The question's been raised several times over the years (see discussions from Feb 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Nov 2017, Jan 2018, Sep 2019, Sep 2022, some more constructive than others...) but there's never been consensus for removal of the club category from players who had a genuine connection with the club (Mr Newell was at Liverpool from age 12 to 18) but didn't appear for the first team. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Most of the users seem to agree on removing the category for youth players in the September 2022 discussion. Ae245 (talk) 03:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

chatting madshit wallahi

Revert snipes

Always fun to see someone else actively helping out! Cheers! Heyallkatehere (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for your hard work fighting vandalism! Gottagotospace (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edits?

Why????? Wiki conitributor (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

You used the word "thoout". Ae245 (talk) 03:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

That was a spelling error. Wiki conitributor (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Ae245 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your swift action with the Toby Carvery page! OnlyNano 14:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

To Mr. Ae245,

Dear Mr. Ae245,

You may remember me for my edits on the page of Sacabambaspis, and for my edits not having proper sourcing, I do solemnly apologize for my actions, I just wanted to edit the page of the greatest fish... no... the greatest ANIMAL... NO... THE GREATEST THING OF ALL TIME. I wanted to contribute, but your response to my edits, I understand, I do hereby promise that I shall make clean, and honest edits, that are not swayed by opinions.

TLDR: Me Sowwy :(

Sincerely, User Sacabambaspis, Professional Sacabambaspis Enthusiast Sacabambaspis (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

WestNet Inc., deleted in progress

WestNet Inc., Hi there how are you, could you please undelete it ? It was still in progress and we did our est to follow guidleines.. I appreciate your concerns regarding the article on WestNet Inc. I understand that the initial draft may have come across as promotional, but I am committed to revising and improving the article to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards. WestNet Inc. is a notable company with a significant history in the telecommunications industry. It has been involved in pioneering the deployment of Wi-Fi networks in Calgary and played a crucial role during emergencies such as the 2013 Alberta floods by providing essential internet access through their Mobile HotSpot Vehicles. Additionally, in 2020, WestNet Inc. became a major supplier of medical masks during the global pandemic, highlighting its contributions to public health and safety. I have gathered reliable sources and am currently working on adding comprehensive information to the article, including citations from independent sources to establish the company's notability. Could you please allow me some time to make the necessary improvements? I am dedicated to ensuring that the article adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Thank you for your understanding. (talk) 04:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Calgaryleb (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I can't undelete it because I'm not an admin. You may ask the deleting admin (@Bbb23) on their talk page, or use the articles for creation process. Ae245 (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Really?

Check again. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

That was a mistake, sorry. Ae245 (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Waiting for you to revert yourself. Don't want to edit war with you. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Recent AIV report

Apologies, I didn't read far enough down the page. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Surprised with a user requesting a speedy deletion

Good evening, Ae245. Currently an article I wrote is being nominated for speedy deletion. OK, maybe I did not write it correctly, or whatever. But I am surprised with a fact: there is the user:CarmenNozal64, who seems to have appeared on Wikipedia with the only purpose of contesting this article (and another related to it). Further, CarmenNozal64 placed not one, but three templates requesting deletion, including one "as hoax" (which I consider excessive). And I would like to have some extra time to edit/rewrite. Please, could you be so kind and take a look at it? Thanks in advance. Regards, Fadesga (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

My most cordial greeting, the reason why I placed the promotional ad and deleted the page is because according to what I researched on Google about "Carlos Javier Jarquin" it is objectively seen that he is not a relevant and encyclopedic character, logically, the article is promotional , and I refer to the following tests:

1. The media in which Jarquin collaborates advertise his "works" with excessive promotional language.

2. All articles published in virtual media about Jarquin are made by friends of Jarquin (see Google)

3. Jarquin's books are self-published by Amazon.

4. Holding a virtual event on poetry is not considered of encyclopedic relevance, and then if so, can everyone who makes a couple of self-publications on Amazon and disseminates them in virtual media where they collaborate already appear on Wikipedia? I think that goes against Wikipedia's relevance principles.

5. Please read the discussion about the article, there I highlight an investigation that I did where the same user who created the article "Carlos Javier Jarquin" is a poet and is a friend of Jarquin and has been published by him in the media where he collaborates (you can search on Google).

In short, I do not do it with the intention of affecting Jarquin or anyone but with the intention of maintaining that encyclopedic principle of Wikipedia. If the person who created the article wants a page for his friend, he can make a web page without necessarily having to host his friend's biography on Wikipedia.

Kind regards. CarmenNozal64 (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Decision regarding acceptance of Draft:Damien Haas

Good evening,

I would ask that you reconsider your view that Draft:Damien Haas is ready for mainspace. You appear to have added multiple sources to establish the inclusion of biographical details that are very clearly not suitable for such use, namely "thebiography.org" (which is clearly a low-grade SEO "celeb facts" site with poor use of grammar) and "pop.inquirer.net" (also a low-grade site that also fails on basic spelling and grammar). Beyond that there are basically no sources to demonstrate notability that have been presented and therefore should not be moved into mainspace until such a time it has been established. Rambling Rambler (talk) 23:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I assumed the subject passes the criteria for actors/entertainers by having significant roles in multiple notable films/projects, and therefore is likely to be notable. But yes, I should've considered the suitability of the sources more carefully. I will not accept the draft. Ae245 (talk) 07:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for reconsidering. On those specific criteria they are still in addition to the basic one of having to have enough RS to justify inclusion. Haas' work is relatively broad but seems lacking in major notable roles that would come with the coverage to justify an article on him at present. Rambling Rambler (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

why you delete my edit

when I edit why you delete always 2409:4080:830C:599C:0:0:A46:20AD (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Why you delete this article

This article article shows information of the musican Qalinle, 154.115.222.186 (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)