User talk:AeomMai/Archive1

70.50.16.52 Aeom--Never mind, all is well

Toor rajput

Hello Friend, Are you a toor rajput? What made you ask the question on Talk:rajput ? Shivraj Singh 18:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Mr Stewart deserves an article

whyd u delete The article i did on Jamie Stewart, the teacher?Aeom Mai

The article was nominated as a Speedy deletion by User:Makemi and I agreed. It made no claim to the notability of this teacher - very few primary or secondary school teachers have careers notable enough for an encyclopedia, many college professors don't even. Also it was written in a very un-encyclopedic manner and included a number of NPOV statements. Rmhermen 19:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Qadianism

This page has gone through lot of review and reversion wars and now have reached a compromise. This also includes Ahmadi, Qadianism, Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement, Maulana Muhammad Ali, Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, etc pages. We do not want to revisit these controversal and highly emotionally charged pages. Status-quo is the best solution. Siddiqui 22:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

No, None of these pages will be deleted without agreement of all parties. We have already arrived at a comprimise after many many weeks of reversion wars.

Siddiqui 22:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Remove the delete tag ! You will then have to delete all related such as Ahmadi, Qadianism, Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement, Maulana Muhammad Ali, Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.

Siddiqui 22:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I will report you to Wikipedia if you changed of any pages as discussed above.

Siddiqui 22:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

You can make your changes to these pages. Nazli and I would revert your changes if they create any controversy.

Siddiqui 23:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Merge Qadianism with Ahmadi

Hi, thanks for your message and suggestion. If you follow the history of the Qadianism article you will see that it was up for deletion/merger/redirection some time back [[1]]. The final decision was to merge and redirect. I believe that the decision was correct since most of the information on the Qadianism page is already present on the ahmadi page. However having a seperate article about Qadianism is also not a bad idea for two reasons: 1. The term "Qadianism" is used quite widely (mainly because of its derogatory connotations). 2. Having a seperate page for Qadianism helps cear up the ambiguity between the Ahmadiyya movement and Qadianism. The Qadianism page clearly states that it is other muslims you like to use this term for the Ahmadiyya movement. This ofcourse is my point of view - there may be better ways to present a npov. Please do discuss any issue you may have about the ahmadiyya pages. also you have as much right to edit wikipedia as anyone else. feel free to make any changes you believe will be an improvement (keeping wikipedia policy in mind). best regards Nazli 04:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

== Hi and Thanks for comments ==

Well I am a information juncky and try to improve my self, some time it is necessary to know about something just to understand it. I belief in God and try to find truth, I think our goal is same. "To find and understand the reality" any way, it is easy to have lots of information these days, it is not the matter of belief but to know something. Your suggestion to see Qadianism page, well I will look on it and see what can I do with it, you seems to have also good understanding of the matter, may be we can both work on it, regards phippi46 01:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Also need to know that what part of this page you want to improve, is there any particular aspect you are thinking to check, will be happy to hear your comments phippi46 01:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

If I may venture some advice: when working on an emotionally volatile topic such as the Ahmadiyya movement, it may be a good idea to give explicit reasons for why you are making a particular change. You can use the edit summary or if you need more space you can use the discussion page. Also if you are planing to make a change that you feel is likely to be controversial it will probably be better to discuss your proposed change on the discussion page before going ahead. This way there is less likely hood of starting an edit war. Also if you have a fair, logical and documented reason as to why you made the changes it will be easier for you to defend your position in case an edit war does ensue. It is also polite to inform any long time editors of a page directly if you are going to make drastic changes. Best regards and and best of luck. Nazli 03:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Block

Hello. Thanks for your e-mail. You must share an IP with someone I've blocked for vandalising today. You don't happen to know your IP? If you do, email it to me and I will unblock it. The JPS ^{talk to me} 20:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Qadianism and Islam

The status of Ahmadi, Qadiani, Lahori etc. has been settled by 1974 constitutional amendment. The only result of continued controversy will be negative for Qadiani community in Pakistan. The people who give any status to Mirza in their belief system are not considered Muslim. Siddiqui 00:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Your use of word Nazi to compare to actions of Pakistan government is regretable. You must refrain from using this comparison. Nonetheless, the status of Ahmadi, Qadiani, Lahori etc. in settled in 1974. The people who give any status to Mirza Qadiani in their belief system are not considered Muslim.

Siddiqui 16:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

This matter has alredy been settled after days of testimony by leaders of Qadianism in National Assembly in 1974. Mirza Qadiani himself claimed to be Nabi and Rasool, check Legacy section in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad page. I quote:

One of the main source of dispute during his lifetime and continuing since then, is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's use of the terms “Nabi” (prophet) and “Rasool” (messenger) when referring to himself. Muslims consider the prophet Muhammad to be the last of the prophets and believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's use of these terms is a violation of the concept of “finality of prophet hood”.

Anybody that gives status to Mirza Qadiani in their belief system are not considered Muslim.

Siddiqui 17:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Mirza Qadiani himself claimed to be Nabi and Rasool. Thus he broke one of the cardinal rule of Islam. Shia and Sunni consider eachother Muslims. The claims by obscure groups and their leaders is their opinion. Anybody that gives status to Mirza Qadiani in their belief system are not Muslim.

Siddiqui 17:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I am the son of Lionel Davis and I was wondering if there is any way that I can help improve the article you did on him? (LvdMyrrdin 18:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC))

Qadianism

There are five links to pro-Qadianism pages (including 3 Wikipedia pages and 2 external links) and 5 links to anti-Qadiani website. It is equl and fair.

See also

• Ahmadi
• Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement
• Ahmadiyya Muslim Community

External Links

• Ahmadiyyat Homepage
• Lahori Homepage
• What is Qadianism ?
• Qadianism, a Critical Study
• [allaahuakbar.net/qadianism/ Qadianism]
• How does Qadianism differ from Islam
• Events that led to the Pakistan's constitutional amendments declaring Qadianis (Ahmadi and Lahori) to be non-Muslim

Siddiqui 22:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

There are 5 pro-Qadiani links and 5 anti-Qadiani links. That is fair.

Siddiqui 22:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I was refering to Muslim Page as you have suggested earlier that term Muslim is relative any way in Qadianism page, I think that lots of POV statements presentet by the writer but no solid prove has been present, I was looking this page as you last wrote me to see this page. My openion is that this page either written in a way so its present a netural picture and not just a pov statement from someone and more details should be provided. phippi46 22:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I will be raising the issue of Sockpuppet in Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser. So that we can establish identy of all users have taken part in Qadianism.

Siddiqui 19:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi there, I am sorry but I did not understand what you just wrote on Qadianism page, can you explain that, regards phippi46 22:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok if you consider it neutral than its Ok, but I will see how long your recent edit, will stay because user siddiqui, will repeat his attitude once again, regards.. phippi46 22:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC))

I hope not.. but what I meant every time you put some informative on this artical you just get a simple reversion to previous his own version, without any explainaton, because he thinks he is right.. thats the impression.. phippi46 22:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC))

No it not surprising at all infact, this just shows the mental state of the person, now I have no Idea what happend before between Yahya01 and Siddiqui, but I think it may be the same thing, he may have right something and siddiqui had revert it, without explaination phippi46 23:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Hi I made some minor improvement in your text on Qadianism Page (phippi46 00:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC))

Tweedledum and Tweedledee from Germany, Greece and from parts unknown. I will be raising the issue of Sockpuppet in Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser.

Siddiqui 13:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Ahmadi pages

Hi, sorry for the rather delayed response, I was tied up with life outside of Wikipedia. Regarding your query - if you feel that your edits are being unfairly reverted then the first step is to try all efforts to communicate the problem to the repective editors and try to find a soloution. If that does not work and the other party is very unreasonable you can try contacting a administrator for advice on how to deal with the issue. Best regards Nazli 13:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC).

Qadianism article

Contrary to Siddiqui's claims above, the decision on whether or not to turn the article into a re-direct has already been made, and Siddiqui cannot unilaterally overturn Wikipedia consensus just because he disagrees. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

House Frey

There's no article on House Frey. If you want to add information on the Freys, I would recommend putting it on Houses from A Song of Ice and Fire, which doesn't contain much right now but could become a useful resource on the minor houses, none of which (in my opinion) are really notable enough to warrant their own pages. Brendan Moody 00:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Some of the content you added to House Frey was from the descriptions in the books, which are copyrighted and therefore not allowed in Wikipedia. I've removed everything I recognized as copyrighted text, and added replacements for some of it. I'll put some more in later. Please don't use material from the books in writing articles. Thanks for your attention, and for contributing to the ASOIAF articles. Brendan Moody 01:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I noticed you asked Arbor a question about the Freys. As I mentioned in the latest update to the article, Stevron was the one who died from wounds taken in the battle with Stafford Lannister's armies at Oxcross. The one killed by the Brotherhood Without Banners after Jaime sent him away was Ryman Frey, Stevron's eldest son. Brendan Moody 21:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Oops, nevermind. I see Arbor answered already... Brendan Moody 21:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi what your belief about Isa's Physicall return ?

Just wondering if you can share your thaught on subject matter. Do you belief that physically Jesus was raised to heaven and he is still alive ? phippi46 22:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes offcourse you can, I belief the human hand is necessary other wise no religion can grow, however, in which way you use your hand, is questionable. Having said that, I belief that Isa was not raised by God physically because it is not possible because of rules, which set by God himself. If you belief that the Isa is still alive then you have to accept also that he is Son of God!, why if you remember one sura of Quraan where some one ask Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that if he true prophet, he should climb to heaven and bring proove then they will accept him immediately, and as you know he replied, that My Lord is pure from these nonsence, and I am a human. Now its clearly indicate that for a Human prophet its not possible to live physically in Heaven, so there are two possiblities and one is correct, you choose yourself, Either Isa is Son of God and he is still alive in Heaven, then people who belief that should join the Chris community or He was dead like all other Prophets and will not come back. you can choose regards phippi46 01:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

You know the True Words of God is relative statement, that is why there is so many problem among the believers. Any way I think I asked about your openion about Hazrat Isa's decent to earth.. I am still waiting for your kind reply can you say something on this matter phippi46 17:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

ok then what happend with him do you belief God took him to Heaven and still alive ? and he will come back ? phippi46 16:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I belief that it is never possible for any human ever lived on this earth to live outside earth without earthly necessities, but that long, as Muslim belief Hazrat Isa (Peace be upon him) alive is.. this is clear violation of the Rules made by Allah. About the question of where he lived his later life.. well it is just the matter of belief, hard evidence may never be found.. any way, I like to work on physics projects, currently I am working on a Electric Generator which runs its own produced energy, as a self relient machine and prodice enough energy to use for other purposes also.. Do you have any Idea of experience on such project, pls tell me, thanks.. phippi46 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

What kind of project do you have ? at your school or private and do you are using Magnets also ? phippi46 23:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

What are you thinking to make, a permanent energy source will provide basic start or you will use as a motor, since magnets do have a permanent energy source, some time these machines do not called as a Perpetual motion machine, any way hopefully you will make something phippi46 23:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Other2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Other2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Qadianism

Please do not flag Islamic artic articles for deletion. Qadianism article can also be candidate for deletion. Siddiqui 03:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Whether you attend Catholic or Martian school is no concern of mine. Just don't flag Muslim related articles for deletion.

Siddiqui 10:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

ACS

to answer your questions, no, no, and no. This is an encyclopedia, not a quote board. Wikipedia rules also dictate that all information must be verifiable and prohibits original research. Unless this teacher has been quoted in Newsweek saying "no videogames", it's not encyclopedic or verifiable. --Bachrach44 20:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding pictures of teachers on a school's webpage, I don't know of any rule against it, but frankly I just don't see how it improves the article that much. Also whenever uploading a picture you should check the WP:IUP - there's all sorts of rules regarding copyrights. --Bachrach44 20:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

midget boys? really? --Bachrach44 22:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Cano.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cano.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

School IP

{{unblock}} 209.202.75.74

I'm sorry but too much vandalism has been coming from your school IP. You can still edit at home however. Sasquatch t|c 18:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

GDFL

Hi Aeom! About the Lucy Liu picture, I am not sure how to check if it's GDFL. If it's not a problem could you check? Here is the link: http://www.filmweb.no/bilder/multimedia/archive/00012/Lucy_Liu_i_Charlie_s_12310c.jpg loulou 17:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

balle balle

Hi... can you describe the exist significance / meaning of "balle balle"... I think it's bhangra-ish related... and I know it's in the title of many songs... but... what does it mean and how is it used? Thanks. gren グレン 02:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Parent.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parent.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

But this is not all

If you say leav other to them, then they should leave the matter also right ?, it is the basic mistak you make some time, in discussion, you should provide your statements and relevent prooves and other should do the same. In this whole discussion page, it is easy to see the different statements from different writers, so are you and me. As matter of fact I was thinking to ask you that why should people with belief the Jesus will return later some time back to earth, join the Christianity. At first they belief that Jesus is not son of God, but at the same time they belief that he is alive in heaven, and they also belief he was human.. well I think when a Chris ask them, when Kufar of Arab Asked the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) to climb to heaven and come back, he replied that my Lord is free of these non-sences and I am only Human ! then how can a Human Prohphet like Jesus (PBUH) can go to heaven ? if he is in the heaven then they should also acknowledge that he is Son of God and should Join the Christianity. what you say ?? phippi46 23:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Qadiani campaign against Islam and Maulana Maudaudi

You cannot delete these books. These pages will will be fixed when I have time. Siddiqui 00:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)