User talk:Afackrell/sandbox3

6/11/2019 Evaluation by Paig5

Paig5 (Paig5) 11:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Points: 38/40
• Grade: 95%

Spelling/Grammar

Meets Expectations This meets the expectations, I just have a few suggestions on some minor grammatical changes or sentence structure changes:

1. ...the former at 7.1% and Finland at 7.4%

2. Nokia, the telephone company, and...

Language

Meets Expectations Your language seems very professional.

Organization

Meets Standard Your paragraphs are plenty long enough and look great.

Coding

Meets Standard I don't see anything wrong with any of your coding.

Validity

Meets Standard All of your statements of facts are cited.

Completion

Meets Standard Everything is long enough and you have the right amount of sources.

Relevance

Meets Standard All information included pertains to the subject matter.

Sources

Meets Standard All of your sources are appropriate for what was written. They all seem like high quality sources.

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets standard.

6/11/2019 Evaluation by Gabbym9903

Gabbym9903 (Gabbym9903) 14:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Points: 39/40
• Grade: 97.5%

Spelling/Grammar

Nearly meets standard The spelling and grammar of the edit look good overall with a few mistakes:

1. "industries in Finland as a whole are;" ; should be :

2. "employing about 79% of the cities workforce" cities should be city's

3. "produced by Nokia and 21% of the countries total exports' countries should be country's

4. "The company with distribute 30 million euro" I think with should be will

Language

Meets Standard. The edit is well-written with academic language.

Organization

Meets Standard The formatting looks good and paragraphs are not too long or too short.

Coding

Meets Standard The coding is correct, i didn't find any mistakes.

Validity

Meets Standard There are no signs of plagiarism and the sources used are reliable.

Completion

Meets Standard The edit meets the 5 paragraphs and 20 sources requirements.

Relevance

Meets Standard The flow of information is good and everything is related to the economy of Helsinki.

Sources

Meets Standard The sources correspond to the topic and to Wikipedia's policies. I was only confused by source #9 because when I click the link, it takes me to a page with many files and I don't know which file you got the information from.

Citations

Meets Standard All citations look correct, except the only mistake I found is that there shouldn't be a space after the last sentence of the first paragraph, where citation #4 is.

References

Meets standard. All references seem well-written and formatted.

6/17/2019 Evaluation by DrMichaelWright

DrMichaelWright (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

I had been hoping for better.

• Points: 31/40
• Grade: 77.5%

Spelling/Grammar

Meets standard.

Language

Meets standard.

Organization

Does not meet standard.

• There are no subheaders that make this easier to read, and to provide a skeleton for other editors to add flesh to.
• The paragraph about the airport properly belongs under the Transportation>Aviation header.
• Most of your last paragraph also belongs under transportation.

Coding

Meets standard.

Validity

Nearly meets standard.

• Your first sentence is from the original (which is not bad), but you eliminated the word 'Greater' and changed the reference. By omitting Greater, you essentially change the meaning where there was no need to do so.
• "The gross value added annual growth has been around 4%.[2]" That datapoint is not backed up by the source offered, which replaces the source that is in the current Helsinki article.

Completion

Meets standard.

Relevance

Nearly meets standard.

• "Finland joined the EU in 1995 and the European Economic and Monetary Union in 1999." This is not really relevant for this article.
• "A study done in April 2019 comparing..." is about Finland as a whole, not Helsinki.

Sources

Does not meet standard.

• There are few-if-any peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
• A number of sources are so dated they come from the web archive. The Wayback machine is fine for re-sourcing previously-written material, but not newly-written material about an up-to-date topic.

Citations

Nearly meets standard.

• A couple of space issues.
• "...traffic as well as promote the EU's climate policy objectives." is copy/pasted from original without paraphrasing or quotation marks.

References

Does not meet standard.

• The references are not properly formatted.