Hi! I'm in your botany class and wanted to peer review your article today!
First of all, great work on your article so far. I really think you do a thorough job of evaluating a lot about this plant.
I think you link to other wikipedia articles well within your page. Not only is this crucial to being able to understand more of the unfamiliar concepts, but this enables more people to see your page as well! And it’s better than having to explain all of these complicated terms, like pycnidia, by yourself!
Your sources all seem to be credible (from authoritative backgrounds) which adds to the overall credibility of your article. It also enables you to give your information in an unbiased way!
Each paragraph is cited by at least one source, which is also important to making a quality Wikipedia article.
I’m not sure if you’re planning on adding more information to this article beyond the pests and disease of Hellebore plants. I would definitely recommend adding to your first paragraph or your lead. This section is meant to summarize what people will be expecting to read in the rest of your article. Simply by mentioning the various pests and diseases in this paragraph will allow your article to follow the Wikipedia template a little bit better. If you choose to add more to the article, make sure you include that here as well!
Great work so far, and I look forward to reading more!