User talk:Afernand74/Archives/2023
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Afernand74. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"reduced Lint errors"
FYI, this edit unnecessarily introduced spaces into <br/> and similar tags, and more seriously breaking the tag's effect when inside {{clade}} templates (a phylogenetic tree diagram) and making the text of the tag visible to Wikipedia readers. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing this out. I was trying to remove an obsolote tags and used a script to speed up the tedious process. My apologies for the inconvenience.
- I was about to report a bug on the talk page of the {{clade}} template but found that one of the limitation of this template is precisely the use of line breaks (i.e. <br/>). It is recommended not used them but it works :-). Afernand74 (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:OABOT updates
Hello! Thanks for your past edits using the OAbot tool. I just wanted to let you know that I updated the queue of suggestions, so you should now be able to find more interesting and easy edits to make with it. Best, Nemo 17:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- thanks Afernand74 (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Thank you very much for your recent edits on "List of age-related terms with negative connotations"! These format edits are super-helpful and make the page much more organized. PetSematary182 (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC) |
Editing news 2023 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
- The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
- They are beginning a new project, Edit check.
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! Afernand74 (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Lint errors
Why <ref name= "iucn"> and not <ref name= iucn>?
These seem pointless edits, just edits for the sake of editing, to me. As do most of these "lint errors" on Orbicular batfish
Please explain what the puropse of these edits is? Quetzal1964 (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted my edit and made two separated edits:
- - one to correct a lint error
- - one to format code using scripts. Using straight quotation marks
"to enclose the reference name is recommended per Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citing multiple pages of the same source.
Using a script made things easy to correct this type of typos. Hope this helps. Afernand74 (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. I don’t agree with your interpretation, I interpret the link as saying that the inverted commas are only required where there is a space in the name of the ref. So If the ref was Carter et al, 1987 it should be written as <ref name = “Carter et al, 1987”> but a single word does not require inverted commas. My own view is that if it isn’t broken then it doesn’t need fixing but each to their own (within reason!) Quetzal1964 (talk) 09:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Lint
Hello!
It is not necessary to change b style to span style, as b style is essentially <b><span style> in shorter terms. And changing from b style to span style without adding b removes the bolding, which changes how the signature displays (maybe not in this case, since it was background coloring for a nbsp, but would change any non whitespace displaying characters. B style is also not lint error, so shouldn't need any adjustments.
For all lint issues that are specifically talked about within the conversation of the error, we are leaving them as they are, so if doing other delinting, keep an eye out for that.
I've been through all of the Template talks and have cleared all possible Template talk errors that are not discussed, so they shouldn't need any further addressing.
Thank you for your efforts however, and feel free to ask any delinting questions at WP:LINT (guidelines for delinting are also here)
Cheers, Zinnober9 (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Afernand74 (talk) 07:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
span tags that apply color to links need to be inside the link
In this edit, you changed
<font color="amaranth">[[User:Shapiros10|Shapiros10]]</font>
to
<span style="color:amaranth;">[[User:Shapiros10|Shapiros10]]</span>
That fix is not valid, as you can see if you look at the resulting color: Shapiros10. The span tags need to go inside the wikilink like this:
[[User:Shapiros10|<span style="color:amaranth;">Shapiros10</span>]]
That results in Shapiros10.
Also, please do not apply article-space fixes like changing - to – in people's talk page comments, per WP:TPO. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. The edit you are suggesting doesn't lead to the expected result on modern web browsers. Both edits are equivalent. You need to replace the "color: amaranth" with "color:#F19CBB" to get the expected result. That results in Shapiros10 and not Shapiros10. 193.191.210.100 (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on Sevilla FC (women)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sevilla FC (women), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women In Red
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
bugs in OABot
Hi @Afernand74. Can you please stop running OABot to remove "doi-access=free" until OABot bugs have been worked out? Some of your recent edits such as special:diff/1172389319 were incorrect (could you manually check any similar edits you have made to make sure they weren't similarly buggy?). See discussion at User talk:OAbot § bot incorrectly removed manually added free access tag. –jacobolus (t) 19:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Jacobolus for bringing this'to me attention. I only made two trials with this bot. I will not use it until further notice. Afernand74 (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. Have a nice day! –jacobolus (t) 20:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
East Asia Summitck
We were editing East Asia Summit simultaneously. Someone had reverted me, I saw the problem with my edit, so I went back to my version and fixed the problem. If your edit is still needed, please make it again. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris No problem. I improved/simplified the coding of the infobox. Afernand74 (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Lint fixes are good, but editing talk pages to change other editors' punctuation isn't
I found User talk:RHaworth/2014 Aug 09 in Lint errors: Links in links (User talk), and determined the error was added in your edit of 08:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC), so I reverted. Then I fixed the lint errors, which were one Tidy font link bug and a bunch of obsolete <font> tags. Then I took a look at the differences between your lint fix and mine, and I saw you made a whole bunch of changes that you should not have made. Most or all of these would be fine in article space, but in general, "mistakes" on a talk page, such as spelling and punctuation errors, should be left alone. Yes, do fix lint errors. But don't make these corrections:
- change hyphen (-) to en dash (–)
- remove multiple blanks
- change capitalization of template names that work properly either way
- use HTML names of characters, such as changing the em dash (—) to —
For more advice, see Wikipedia:Linter#How you can help. If you are still editing talk pages making changes like you did in User talk:RHaworth/2014 Aug 09, please stop! And consider reverting such changes you have already made. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Edits like the ones above were still happening as of 22 October 2023; note change of hyphen to dash, underscore to space, and other changes that are either unnecessary or unwelcome. Please change as little as possible, just enough to fix the Linter errors. Spelling and punctuation errors in other editors' talk page contributions are not appropriate, per the guideline at WP:TALKO. There is also no need to add or remove slash "/" characters from br tags. They work the same, and the syntax highlighter has been adjusted to allow either format. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris @Jonesey95 Thank you. I will stop correcting Linter errors in the future and let more qualified experts do it. Apologize for any trouble. I will look for a tool to undo all my previous edits in a batch mode. In the meantime, free to revert any of my previous edits. Afernand74 (talk) 07:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- You are welcome to improve Wikipedia in any useful way, including fixing lint errors, or whatever else you find worthwhile. If you have trouble knowing which fixes to avoid on talk pages (even though it's rather straightforward), you could work on articles and drafts, and stay away from talk pages. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris @Jonesey95 Thank you. I will stop correcting Linter errors in the future and let more qualified experts do it. Apologize for any trouble. I will look for a tool to undo all my previous edits in a batch mode. In the meantime, free to revert any of my previous edits. Afernand74 (talk) 07:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|