AfiraMirza

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is essentially the same as Draft:Karl Lillrud, which has already been rejected as not satisfying biographical notability, and as having sources that are not independent. Most of the references in this draft are also by the subject, and so are not independent. The repeated resubmissions of these drafts are tendentious.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, AfiraMirza! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Isabella Mayor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isabella Mayor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)