Aishe2111

Welcome!

Hello, Aishe2111, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with French; did you know there is a Wikipedia in French? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bienvenue!

Bonjour, Aishe2111, et bienvenue sur Wikipédia. Les efforts pour améliorer Wikipédia sont toujours les bienvenus ; malheureusement, vos contributions ne sont pas rédigées dans un anglais suffisamment bon pour être utiles, ou alors ne sont pas rédigées en anglais du tout. Vous semblez être plus familier avec le français. Saviez-vous qu'il existe une Wikipédia en français ? Vous préféreriez peut-être y contribuer. En tout cas, bienvenue sur Wikipedia, et merci pour vos efforts ! Si vous avez besoin d'aide, n'hésitez pas à me contacter sur ma page de discussion. Merci, 331dot (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merci 331dot :) Aishe2111 (talk) 09:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spendesk (November 3)

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources do not demonstrate notability. Routine coverage such as funding announcements does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spendesk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Aishe2111! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Spendesk

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Aishe2111. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Spendesk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic