March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Harriet Tubman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Weird, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 22:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 23:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Akakasksjsjsusn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 23:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Akakasksjsjsusn/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Akakasksjsjsusn/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11. This page present content from an indefinitely blocked user exists solely to solicit subscribers for some YouTube channel "Go sub to [name] on YouTube"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shearonink (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply