Akhil vinayak.m

In response to your feedback

Akhil vinayak.m, what is very bad? Is there something wrong?

Jedd Raynier (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

 

hello vinayak please stop ur senseless edits without reliable references in wikipedia. In wikipedia if u want to edit anything u should update a reliable source to do that.ur recent edit in nanban is considered as vandalism so pls stop it.if u have reliable sources they u can update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithsuper (talk • contribs) 11:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

7aum Arivu success or failure?

Dude, if u really think 7aum Arivu was finally declared a hit, please provide a reliable source and be more formal in your language. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Smithsuper with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Justin Bieber. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 05:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vettaikaaran (2009 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. X.One ^SOS 14:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devi Priyanka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devi Priyanka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ctoshw (talk) 09:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 7aum Arivu, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 7aum Arivu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 04:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)