Akwasí Píèsíe 1967

Welcome!

Hello, Akwasí Píèsíe 1967, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Please maintain a neutral POV

See WP:NPOV. When you add material that states one POV, even if sourced, without acknowledging that it is a minor of fringe POV, and stated as if accepted when it's not, you put the article out of neutrality. I'm going to revert your contributions for now. You can re-add with more balance, or we can discuss the specifics, here or at the various article talk pages. Dicklyon (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Missing fundamental are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Please do not discuss the topic itself on the talk page. The talk page is only for discussion about improving the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

More to the point, Wikipedia is not the place to push points of view that are not yet represented in reliable secondary sources. It doesn't matter that you believe Heerens's ideas and experiments; they may be fine; this is not the place to challenge other editors to show good alternatives. Do all that off-wiki, and when there's a publication discussing how it all shakes out, we can use that to say something about it. Review WP:V and WP:RS carefully to understand the kind of thing we put into WP. If you want to propose an addition to the article, do so along with a secondary source please. Dicklyon (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)