User talk:AlAboud83/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Furqlus

Source only said that Syrian troops withdraw from the town on their checkpoints to eastern outskirts of Farqalas that would protect town and ISIS bombing attack on checkpoint at the eastern outskirts of the town of Furqlus. Source not said that ISIS take town. Also source said that the according to data from military source clashes between ISIS and Syrian troops at the outskirts of Furqlus, where the ISIS has currently staked their positions at the town’s eastern outskirts, while ISIS reinforcements arrive from the nearby village of Jabab Hamid located west of city of Palmyra. And that the Syrian troops to counter ISIS’ offensive at Farqalas have resumed their assault on the town of Jazal.Al Masdar So that source clear said that the Syrian troops came out of the town to strengthen their checkpoints on perimeter around the city and prevent infiltration ISIS to the city. SOHR and pro ISIS sources also said that ISIS bombing attack the gas pipeline on the road between the cities of Tadmur and Homs near Furqlas Gas Field, which is under regime control.SOHRherehere Hanibal911 (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

And another report from SOHR said about clashes between Syrian troops and ISIS in the vicinity of Furqlus area in countryside east of Homs.SOHR And SOHR also not said that clashes in the town of Furqlus or thet the town was taken by ISIS. As SOHR earlier said clashes was near with gas pipeline to east from Furqlus. Hanibal911 (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

And pro ISIS sources also just said that ISIS kills 4 elements of Assad's forces in an ambush east of the village of Furqlus.herehereherehere And not said that ISIS captured Furqlus. Only said that ISIS ambushed four soldiers and bombing attack on the gas pipeline on the road between the cities of Tadmur and Homs near Furqlas Gas Field. Hanibal911 (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

And also the author of the source Al Masdar only said about clashes on the outskirts of Furqlus.Leith Abou Fadel And as said other activist ISIS just blew up a gas pipeline and was the sporadic clashes between Syrian troops and ISIS in this area. This was not a deep organized attack.here Hanibal911 (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Also source said that Syrian troops repelled attack ISIS at the checkpoint outside of the town of Furqlus and launched a counter-assault to push back the enemy combatants and then reinforce the Palmyra-Homs Highway between Farqalas and the Tiyas Military Airpor. And in addition to the firefights on the highway Palmyra-Homs, the Syrian troops and ISIS continued their battle for control of the Jazal Gas Fields and the village itself; if the former can capture this part of Homs, they will have effectively put themselves in position to launch a counter-offensive at Palmyra.Al Masdar So as I said yesterday ISIS only attack army position outside a town of Furqlus and never entered in the town and army repelled their attack on checkpoint to east from the town and counterattacked ISIS. Hanibal911 (talk) 06:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Research battalion

If they are incorrect please provide sources that state they are incorrect. So far, multiple sources, from pro-gov. Masdar to pro-op. Syria live map, as well as pro-opp SOHR, have indicated the one to the southeast of the airbase was the one that was captured. Even multiple pro-rebel twitter posters have confirmed it. Just last night, SOHR stated the Army was 35 kilometers from enveloping the rebels southeast of Damascus, which would correspond to the distance stated between SAA positions at the research base and those further south in the volcanic plato. EkoGraf (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

here is a map that shows where the research battalion is https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1x6GpUyGry2EVLDOEQgXnE-nlISQ&ll=33.96064308647625%2C37.64151145734104&z=11.Alhanuty (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Plus show me the SOHR source that says so.Alhanuty (talk) 22:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

As far as I can see, the source you linked also shows the research battalion to the southeast of the air base to be government-held, if you just look a bit lower. And here [1], per SOHR 35 kilometers left to encircle the rebels, which is the distance between the research battalion to the southeast and the Rahba area further to the south. EkoGraf (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

it says the Scientific Research area in the eastern Al-Qalamoun in Rif Dimashq,not in the Badiyah.Alhanuty (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

It says The clashes against the factions...are taking place in the Syrian Desert in 2 opposite areas, the Scientific Research area in the eastern Al-Qalamoun in Rif Dimashq, and al-Rahba area in the countryside of al-Suwaidaa. The Regime forces try to advance in the area between these 2 fronts, which are about 35 km away of each other’s. So, they are referring to the clashes in the desert, but more importantly, they plainly state there is 35 kilometers between the Scientific Research area in question and al-Rahba. 35 kilometers is the distance between al-Rahba and the Scientific Research area to the southeast of the air base. The distance between the one you are referring to and al-Rahba is a lot lot larger. Plus, they are referring to these clashes as attempts to besiege a wide space of this area until reaching Teshreen power plant and al-Dumayr airbase. So again, this is referring to those rebel-held areas south of the airbase. That they said the eastern Qalamoun was obviously a mistake on their part considering they were pretty clear regarding the exact distance between al-Rahba and that area, as well as in regards to the position of the rebel area the SAA is trying to besiege. Also, the site you linked for me before, here [2], its also marking that area as SAA-held. Even says in English Scientific Research when you click on it. EkoGraf (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Can you help verify translations of articles from Arabic

Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Arabic to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Arabic article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Arabic , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Arabic. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

• Salman bin Yousuf Al Dossary
• Leila Alaoui
• Al-Fajaa

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Arabic article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

YPG advance toward Tall Abyad

YPG and their allies advance against of ISIS east of Tall Abyad. Here a map from the kurdish sourceColdkurd Hanibal911 (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Okay i will update it.Alhanuty (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Zaid

Ok, so if developments in Tal Abyad and Ain Issa are occuring very fast I dont understand why you hurry up on changing the map icons (Well, I understand thats because your ideas, but remember that this is an encyclopaedia, and we should leave our POVs aside when we edit maps). Why not wait until reliable international outlets confirm it?.--HCPUNXKID 17:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

They're trying to shut down the map

So it seems like some people are trying to either shut down the map or make it 'confirm rigorously to Wikipedia standards'. Which basically is code for no POV pushing, no amateur maps. I know you have tried to keep the map up to date with developments on the ground, and I think that's a good idea. I also am quite confident that there are FSA/YPG fighters present in Ayn Issa. What makes me angry is that people are reverting for example, Ayn Issa back to full ISIS control because, and I quote, "reverting POV vandalism edits, users breaking the rules constantly. admin is already informed".

And all of this with tons of people and twitter from pro-kurd and pro-opp sources saying they've captured it. mobile.twitter.com/search?q=ayn+issa Admittedly, there is a lack of reliable independent sources, but still. We should all be very careful and explain in detail why we made the edits we did; if we explain our reasoning, the higher-ups might be nicer to us. Do you have any thoughts? Pbfreespace3 (talk) 16:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC) leave it for now.Alhanuty (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

SVG Maps

I would like to edit these .svg maps but i do somehow always stuck to a problem. After I'm finnished with editing, i want to save the .svg file, but it saves together with like 120 other files. I tryed to group them all inside the program, but still, the same problem, i get One file that i want and 120 other files which should be merged with that big one but they aren't. What do you think ? DuckZz (talk) 21:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC) use,Inkscape.Alhanuty (talk) 21:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Aleppo military research center is contested not green

Which sources are you mentioning? I mean, removing pro-rebels. The change on the map was done using twitter sources. On the main talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cities_and_towns_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#Aleppo_Research_Center it was reached a consensus that it is contested.Paolowalter (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your editing of the Syrian map. 3bdulelah (talk) 22:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Syrian Civil War and ISIL general sanctions

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

New icons

Hi, for a response to your request on my user page, please see my response to Pbfreespace3 on my talk page.
In essence, we need to choose a new colour, that is both readily distinguished from existing colours and not confusing to users.
Once done, I can create the entire set of icons very quickly. André437 (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hasakah result

Sources needed that describe that kind of result. What you described, though it may be true, is Original Research on your part. EkoGraf (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Mount Abdulaziz

Hi!

I dont´t see that your latest edit of about 15 places around Mount Abdulaziz could be valid? If I follow your sources I see only one village (Jafar) that changed from YPG to ISIS. What in your source did I miss? It does not ad up please revert or re-specify/explain the sources. Rhocagil (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC) it looks the YPG is going to regain these positions in the incoming hours,so i will revert back after source state so, for my edit, a military force can't pop in a town amid the military force depth and jut control tht,how did ISISa capture Ghurah withuut controlling the road towards it,plus other arabic sources confirm that ISIS took other villages http://www.qasioun.net/%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84/%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D9%8A%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AC%D9%85-%D8%AC%D8%A8%D9%84-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B2-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%A9/4679/,http://arabi21.com/story/863127/%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%8A%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%8A%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%B7%D8%B1-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B7-%D8%A8%D8%AC%D8%A8%D9%84-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%8A%D8%AC%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%A9 plus,they usually mention some of the villages,not all of them.Alhanuty (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC) HawarNews confirms that YPG lost control over mount AbdulAziz http://hawarnews.com/ypg-%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A3-%D8%A8%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AC%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%83%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86/

Kweyres airbase

The undiscussed name change of the article you made does not fit with the topic of the article. The topic of the specific article in question is about the offensive that started in mid-September. If you wish for there to be an article on the long-running two-year siege of the base create a new article. Regards! EkoGraf (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

I rather combined them both,because Kuweires has been besieged for 3 years,so siege is appropriate.Alhanuty (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

I have no problem with there being an article on the siege of the base and I will not obstruct you in creating one. However, the current offensive has been notable enough in reliable media outlets to have its own article. EkoGraf (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

If you want I can even help you to expand the article on the siege after you start it. And the article on the offensive can be a sub-article (which goes into much greater detail on the operation) of the bigger article on the siege (which would be per WP policy). EkoGraf (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

i hardly have any time to do so in the incoming time maybe 5 days later,but the siege is going to be broken.

I think so too. Ok, when you start it let me know. EkoGraf (talk) 04:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

User talk:SyrianObserver2016

Could you provide some diffs—here or on my talk page, but not on SO2016's page—that back up your claim that User:SyrianObserver2016 may be abusing multiple accounts? —C.Fred (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Or never mind, I think he tipped his hand while I was writing this.[3] —C.Fred (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC) he threatened to report me to Putin,should i be worried.Alhanuty (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Sadad

BBC clear said that the clashes between government troops and IS are said to be continuing on the outskirts of Sadad.http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34693670 and other source also clear said that Sadad under SAA http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/christian-town-in-east-homs-faces-a-deadly-threat-from-isis/ SOHR also said that clashes between the regime forces and allied militiamen against IS militants are still taking place on the eastern outskirts of the town.http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/11/the-clashes-continue-in-abo-al-hol-area-while-the-russian-warplanes-attack-the-countryside-of-hama/ SO town not contested.http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/11/airstrikes-carried-out-on-palmyra-while-explosion-takes-place-in-sadad-area-and-is-advance-toward-it/ 46.201.163.140 (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Mount al-Buwayr

Which source shows this hill as YPG held? The facebook one provided doesn't work for me?Prohibited Area (talk) 10:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Al-'Arishah

This page needs addidtional informations.Xx236 (talk) 06:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Raman Yusif

Maybe it would be beter to use aranews as a source, if they find him reliable. Or some other news portal who uses his information. --Hogg 22 (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

For edits at Syrian Civil War Bruskom talk to me 05:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Sykol

This or this. Maybe the Sykol mentioned is one on the north? --Hogg 22 (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC) the government map shows it to be the southern one http://aleppo.moh.gov.sy/img_areas/reef/3enal3arab/3enal3arab.jpg.Alhanuty (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Deir ez-Zor clashes

I see you edit this maphere and you made mistake. Ayyash Storage Terrain still not under control of ISIS because SOHR said that SAA still hold part of Storage Terrain.here also clashes stiill going in Al-Baghiliyah.herehere Sûriyeya (talk) 08:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

SOHR and other source also said SAA made advance in Al-Baghiliyah.herehere Sûriyeya (talk) 10:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Probably this map can help.here Sûriyeya (talk) 10:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi!, I just noticed something with you, that you concentrate too much about GhiathArodaki user. May I know the reason, please? thank you for your collaboration.JouelSamah (talk) 04:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

User:GhiathArodaki

Hi!, I just noticed something with you, you concentrate too much on user GhiathArodaki. May I know the reason, please? thank you for your collaboration.JouelSamah (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Why aren't you answering my question, sir? I waited so long, I wish everything is ok.JouelSamah (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Al Ruwashid crossing

Hi, AlAboud. In this edit: [4] you added Al Ruwashid as a crossing on the Syrian-Jordanian border under government control after Nasib had fallen to the rebels. Do you happen to have a source for this? I do not doubt the correctness as most of Suwayda province definitely was and still is government controlled but a source for this would nevertheless be helpful. All I found so far was this twitter post of 3 April 2015 [twitter.com/vivarevolt/status/584069358869204993], which to me makes perfect sense as the Assad government surely has every interest to open up such a border crossing to Jordan, but some more reliable source like a newspaper article or something like that would of course be better. Thank you in advance. --Proofreader (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Two Words

Get Lost.غياث العرودكي 22:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by غياث العرودكي (talk • contribs)

Jarabulus

The SOHR source you showed actually said FSA has taken control of Jarabulus "almost entirely" which means there are still some pockets left. This is even repeated in SOHR's English website: http://www.syriahr.com/en/?p=49818. I see many users hurriedly start editing without waiting for independent confirmation or properly reading the sources. There is no reason to hurry. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

al-Rai

You reverted my edit changing control of Al-Rai claiming the source is "outdated". However, the source is only a day old, ie. it was published on August 27. Unless you can present a later source that says al-Rai has been captured you cannot claim it as "outdated". Can you please provide a source that proves you correct? If not then you have reverted a sourced edit. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlAboud83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Al-Tayfur air base

Whether you can adjust the time of the battle in the inbox? There is a problem. --Baba Mica (talk) 15:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ISIS' index finger signal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

number of protesters

Little or not there was still some FSA activity, with opposition media still confirming the deaths of hundreds of FSA fighters during that first year. Plus there was also a large number of bystander civilians killed as well, not all were protesters. EkoGraf (talk) 15:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Revert

Ok! I will whait more confirmations besides a QalaatAlMudiq. Mehmedsons (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlAboud83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

RE: Language

'Pro-Assad' language? No, it's unbiased language, because the situation hasn't been clear and every source claims something. The actual peaceful protests in 2010/2011 that called for reforms have stopped and many of the protesters, among them people I know, were satisfied with the constitutional reforms and that was basically all they wanted, not the fall of the government and the murder of the president. THOSE were the peaceful protests that have been answered. The protests calling for the 'fall of the "regime"', insulting Assad and burning security and governmental building are another story, and far from peaceful, wouldn't you say?. But every side has a tale to tell so at this point 'allegedly' and 'supposedly' are the closest we can get to accuracy to avoid being unbiased. Jadd Haidar (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Flag of Syria

I would have a lot to say about an attempt to delete the modern 3-red-star flag from the article, but I'm not sure I have too much to say about terminology... AnonMoos (talk) 03:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The editor who attempted to do so,was a sockmaster,who tried to influence the debate with sockpuppets.Alhanuty (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm Editor abcdef. I noticed that you recently removed content from al-Hasakah Governorate campaign (2012–13) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Editor abcdef (talk) 05:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Eastern al-Hasakah offensive

AlAboud83, read what I wrote in my edit [5]. I didn't write they "captured" 200 villages, I wrote they were "contesting" 200 villages, quote from the source [6] "Over the past week, YPG and regime forces have been fighting with IS for the more than 200 villages surrounding Tel Hamees". EkoGraf (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake, didn't see the date of the news report. Thought it was from earlier (December 2014). You are correct and I corrected myself. EkoGraf (talk) 21:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlAboud83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlAboud83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism accusation

Not trying to make this a big deal, but I have a long history on the 2020 Dems page. I don't vandalize. The reversion is all well and good, but do not just randomly accuse me of vandalizing an article I've dedicated myself to improving. --Volvlogia (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Okay,i am sorry,but this is an offical wikipedia article,and it must stay offical,not a place to put random photos.Alhanuty (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Can you stop?

Can you just stop being biased, for real. Every time someone tries to be civil you start accusing them of being from the opposite side and vandalizing. Keep your opinions out of this site and just stick to the policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:C400:149D:A452:6DA8:FD42:332A (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

not true,Assadist are trying to change the status quo on the flag of syria page,ignoring important facts on the ground.Alhanuty (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

And also the opposition. What facts? the fact that Russia, Iran, and Assad is kicking your ass? And you're a Kurd. You have nothing to do with Syria bro. So chill out, you can't decide what is the flag of a country that you don't belong to.2601:646:C400:149D:A452:6DA8:FD42:332A (talk) 21:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

looks you don't want to contribute in a meaningful way on wikipedia,get out of my page.Alhanuty (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

IP harassment

Hi AlAboud83! It's been brought to my attention that an IP user has been harassing and threatening you. I believe that the user has been blocked. Is this still going on? Let me know (please ping me in your response) and I'll be happy to take a look. :-) Best regards - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

he is currently harassing me at simple english and german wikipedia.Alhanuty (talk) 04:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Ah, okay. You'll want to get in touch with a steward on the meta wiki in order to have the user investigated and globally blocked. I believe that the Steward requests/Global page is the right place to ask for assistance related to cross-wiki harassment and threats. Worst case scenario, ask for help at the Stewards' noticeboard. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

i try my best,but it will take time for me to learn how to submit a report on the steward request.Alhanuty (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC) User SkyGazer 512 has submitted a report about it to the steward.Alhanuty (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Maps Assistance

Hello, I noticed you did some work on the Syrian Civil War detailed map. I would like to commission you to build a few maps for me if possible. Please e-mail me so we can discuss. Twillisjr (talk) 17:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Umm al Quşayr

Hi, you created Umm al Quşayr several years ago, and I'm trying to de-orphan it. Unfortunately because I only speak English I haven't been able to verify it as a village name - GEOnet turns up no results for it, and the coordinates don't seem to come back to a matching village on GMaps. Do you remember the source you were working from when you created it? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Geonames.Alhanuty (talk) 16:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Do you mean geonames.nga.mil/namesgaz? Because that's what I mean by GEOnet, and I searched that and didn't get any matches for a village with the same or similar coordinates as what's in the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

https://www.geonames.org/162976/umm-al-qusayr.html. Alhanuty (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

So... Geonames is user-generated, which means it's not considered a reliable source. There's also the problem that the article says it's a village, but Geonames has it as a ruin, and with different coordinates than what's in the articl. Were there any other sources you used? Do you know if it was recently ruined in the civil war, or is this an ancient ruin? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lebanese insurgency detailed map

Template:Lebanese insurgency detailed map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)