Al Leluia81
Welcome
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
edit
- Hi Al Leluia81! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:53, Saturday, September 5, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
September 2015
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page You Can Call Me Al has been reverted.
Your edit here to You Can Call Me Al was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq-gYOrU8bA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Discography articles
editI'm not sure why you're trying to add a biography about Mullins on his discography article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Discographies that are completed have lead sections. See WP:DISCOGSTYLE and WP:LEAD. I reviewed how lead sections in other discographies are written before posting my referenced section.Al Leluia81 (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Frederick Larson (Filmmaker)
- added a link pointing to Attorney
- Star of Bethlehem
- added a link pointing to Attorney
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The Star of Bethlehem (main page)
editHello Al Leluia81
I would like to discuss some of the changes you have made on the Star of Bethlehem page. Can we do that?
Sincerely,
Skyfall676 Skyfall676 (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Skyfall 676: Of course. I'm open.Al Leluia81 (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Skyfall676 (sorry I spelled your name wrong above), I have responded on the main talk page about some issues. If you have anything else, here or on your talk page would be fine.Al Leluia81 (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
____________
From Victor1500
Are you aware that your "Regulus, Jupiter, and Venus" section should probably be listed under conjunction theories? Your text is definitely much longer than necessary. Someone had kindly edited it down reflecting your ideas, but you refused that text an restored the much longer one. You have largely developed your material elsewhere (Larson and Star film pages). I suggest that you trim down your material, place it in the conjunction section and make directional links to your other articles. These are my suggestions. I do not insist on it, but it would seem correct from my perspective.
Sincerely, Victor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor1500 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for offering your perspective. I think both the areas currently titled "Regulus, Jupiter, and Venus" and "Jupiter's Annual Cycle" and the entire section on astronomical events needs to be restructured, according to chronology as well as to types of events. Since there are many contributors, doing that at this time is difficult because those sections are underdeveloped. The text on Larson and others is significant and is apt to be the leading hypothesis that has been developed today, and it does not cover much of the topic but only provides the basics--and it is about three combined events.
- The article is 4,164 words of usable text as of right now (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_of_Bethlehem&diff=706312591&oldid=706310099), estimated by using a word processor, which is far below the 5,000 to 10,000 words or more that it could be if it became more within the norm for Wikipedia articles so that a reader who wants more comprehensive information might have it. A page of about 30 kB to 50 kB of readable prose roughly corresponds to 4,000 to 10,000 words, according to WP:SIZE. As that "Article Size" editing guideline also says, "Content should not be removed from articles simply to reduce length; see Wikipedia:Content removal#for acceptable reasons." The section is "long" only in comparison to sections which have missing information themselves, which is expected in an encyclopedia article that is still developing. It is the minimum to cover a much more broad topic.
- The edits you refer to generated reference errors I have waited since the start of January to correct and have had significant discussion on the Talk page under "The Star Project // Convergence of scriptures and astronomy", "Bias", and "Pious Fiction Work Area" since that time. It is currently referenced properly, and it is not exactly as I would like, but is needed as part of getting this article updated. A request, by the way, to get this article updated and get some Larson information into it was made on its Talk page ("Misleading and Outdated Information") in July 2013: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_of_Bethlehem
- The articles you mention I did write, and have not linked to them in part for that reason. They also give a general view at this time and are not a substitute for having the ideas in the main "Star of Bethlehem" article. Larson's DVD The Star of Bethlehem is estimated to have now been seen by over 100 million people. I didn't mention that DVD in the article, and am not certain it would be correct for me to do so. Returning the most basic information to this article took out errors and restored relevant content.
- I'm glad you are working on the newly renamed " The Year of Jesus' Birth and the Star" section. That section had content removed in December before being deleting altogether. I brought it back but there was more content that has been missing. Al Leluia81 (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- To clarify, when I mentioned "many contributors" above, I referred to astronomers and the other scholars, rather than meaning the editors. Al Leluia81 (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm glad you are working on the newly renamed " The Year of Jesus' Birth and the Star" section. That section had content removed in December before being deleting altogether. I brought it back but there was more content that has been missing. Al Leluia81 (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Star of Bethlehem
editI don't think I have ever read as disingenuous a comment as the one you left on my talk page. If you cannot edit constructively and assume good faith, you should not be on Wikipedia at all. --Rbreen (talk) 09:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- You left a message on my talk page describing this message as "harrassment". I take this as a very serious allegation. I stand over every word and will defend it with evidence if necessary.
- If you genuinely believe this as harrassment, and are not merely posturing for effect, make a complaint about it and I will defend - otherwise do the gracious thing and apologise. --Rbreen (talk) 10:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Rbreen: Please note that I have argued in favor of retaining the “Pious Fiction” section several times, so I have no argument against that perspective being presented provided it is done in accordance with Wikipedia policy; your recent edits I removed since they were not, and you had also removed references to historical works from Josephus, and changed wording to promote a biased version. However, if you think something important was removed, you are welcome to explain what it was and if I think it is justified I will work with you on it. Regards, Al Leluia81 (talk) 20:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Here is the link to the conversation on Rbeen's Talk page I have noted above. Al Leluia81 (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star of Bethlehem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphanius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Craig Chester (astronomer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ernest Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Al Leluia81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
editThank you for your recent articles, including Carlos Jaschek, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Al Leluia81. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Al Leluia81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Al Leluia81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Passion of the Christ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miles O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Introduction to viruses
edit
|
COVID-19 Barnstar | |
| Your detailed copyedit of Introduction to viruses is much appreciated. A 12-year-old Featured article, Into to viruses was quickly updated for Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 27, 2020; your serious copyedit should hold it in good stead for a long while. Thanks again, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC) |
- God's blessings to you, too; stay well! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |