Alaaan

{{helpme}}

automated filters are making it hard to edit the Fort Gay article. I've tried assigning myself administrator rights on my user page but it still hasn't worked. Alaaan (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Panic over. Alaaan (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fort Gay, West Virginia, you may be blocked from editing. Wolfnix • Talk • 13:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

It wasn't disruptive editing, but thanks for letting me know! Alaaan (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Many editors believe that it was a disruptive edit, as it was vandalism. Sorry that you don't agree, but Wiki's Vandalism policy is clear. Thank you for understanding. --Wolfnix • Talk • 14:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Fort Gay, West Virginia worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Wolfnix • Talk • 13:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for posing as an administrator. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 13:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alaaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi sorry I didn't realise I was not supposed to do that. I was trying to see if I could assign myself the admin rights so I could get passed the filter which was preventing me from making good edits to the Fort Gay article which is genuine. I hope you understand my reasonings. If you don't want me to do admin stuff, or if this is against the rules then I promise I won't do it if you unblock me. Thanks for taking the time to review this request! Al

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but that's not all you've been doing. You'll also have to explain why you were operating multiple accounts. TNXMan 14:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alaaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry I don't know what you're talking about!

Decline reason:

I am sure that you do. You created this account in April 2009, and then the account is inactive util recently, when you appear with an obvious working knowledge of wikipedia; which I submit must necessarily include a perfectly good understanding of what an admin is. Therefore, please, under what account name have you been editing? And do you fully understand how very serious it is to impersonate an administrator? Two answers, please.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you choose to answer, your answer should include a convincing reason as to why you attempted to evade your block by editing using your IP after your block; IP is also now blocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Notice Before Action

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alaaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Legal threat redacted  Chzz  ►  23:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request does not address the reason for your block and is therefore declined. MuZemike has removed your talk page access for making legal threats.  Sandstein  19:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Legal threat redacted  Chzz  ►  23:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Since you are now intending to take legal action, I have revoked your access to edit this talk page pending conclusion of the legal situation or when you unambiguously retract your legal threat. You may not participate in the encyclopedia while the litigation is pending. Regards, –MuZemike 19:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)