Alain Martin
Proposed deletion of Understanding Barack Obama on November 4th, 2008
edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Understanding Barack Obama on November 4th, 2008, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Understanding Barack Obama on November 4th, 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 06:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Understanding Barack Obama on November 4th, 2008 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 07:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alain martin
edit
A tag has been placed on Alain martin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 07:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brian Morrissey, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.executive.org/Morrissey. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. re this article, I think you may have misunderstood what 'unreferenced' means. What you've actually done is create links to other articles - whilst good, this is not the same as providing references. References are (basically) used to prove that the article content is true - at the moment, there's nothing in the article which says where you obtained the information. This therefore currently violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability - which can be seen by clicking here. If you need help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. CultureDrone (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Understanding Economics
edit Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Understanding Economics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Raven1977 (talk) 01:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Barbara Kinney.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Barbara Kinney.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
June 2014
edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to François Delattre may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the [[Permanent Mission of France to the United Nations]] in New York effective July 15, 2014.<ref>{{cite news | url =http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do;jsessionid=?cidTexte=
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)