Welcome!

Hello, Albert.guiteras, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adaptive DPCM

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adaptive DPCM, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article is misleading at best. ADPCM is nothing more than DPCM with higher resolution in the quantization, and it is already described correctly at Pulse-code modulation#Digitization as part of the PCM process. I think this article is really about G.722, which already has its own article, but I don't know enough about that codec to comment.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think I've rescued it by adding some sourced content about actual ADPCM instead of just about G.722, though I explained that part more, too. Dicklyon (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply