Alexander Schiff

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Chriscoritsidis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Christopher Coritsidis, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Mduvekot (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Chriscoritsidis", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because implied shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Per [this diff] your username is a username implying shared use, which is not permitted. Mduvekot (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Christopher Coritsidis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Coritsidis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Coritsidis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

(@Largoplazo:)

Dear Largoplazo,

I fail to see how the page on Christopher Coritsidis is in violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have reviewed the article and made edits to make it more neutral in tone.

If you would be so kind to let me know where lies the issue with this article, we will gladly rectify it.

Thanks,

Alex

˜˜˜˜

Hello. The tone of the article isn't a concern. It's that Christopher Coritsidis doesn't appear to conform to Wikipedia's notability policy that sets forth criteria for inclusion of a topic on this site. My explanation is at the deletion discussion page, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Coritsidis. It links to the pertinent guidelines. Largoplazo (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

---

(@Largoplazo:

I have reviewed your explanation and have edited the article as well as found additional links/references to confirm/affirm the notable activity of the Opus 1 Foundation. ˜˜˜˜

One reference briefly reports that a local concert was held, and mentions that "It featured internationally acclaimed stars; Christopher Coritsidis (violin) Jorge Viladoms (piano) and Anastasiya Roytman (soprano)." A bare mention of his name, no substantial coverage. The other source isn't coming up right now but I recall that when I glanced at it before, it was a brief report on a concert that was going to take place locally. Local entertainment and cultural coverage generally doesn't contribute to notability. I think I remember that it did mention the Opus 1 Foundation, insofar as it reported that the foundation sponsored the concert, but that isn't "substantial coverage". I've gotten the impression that foundation's mission is admirable, but whether we find something admirable doesn't assist in a finding of notability (and, conversely, finding that a subject doesn't meet the notability requirements isn't a judgment that an organization's mission is anything other than admirable).

Your two other edits in your latest round other than the edits where you added those sources merely removed information. Largoplazo (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

_____

(@Mduvekot:

Again thank you for trying to adhere to the credibility of my recent article. I have no personal nor professional affiliation with the subject of the page 'Christopher Coritsidis' as misinterpreted from my message regarding autobiographical content. I have not been paid nor do I have any motivation to promote the subject for any reason other than as a topic of general interest. ˜˜˜˜