Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Fisher concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Fisher, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Fisher

edit
 

Hello Alexandra08w. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Graham Fisher".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Fisher}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Toynbee Hall article

edit

Hello. I should explain something about my edits to Toynbee Hall, which is that the first two edits on Friday 28 March were made at a Wikimedia UK workshop for the Royal Society of Chemistry. They were mine, but through another trainer's account. I then tidied up the article when I got home.

What we were doing was to illustrate the problems of articles about institutions, in relation to Wikipedia's guideline on "conflict of interest". Please review the page at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

I had some points to make on the day about choice of language. I also explained that there was a case to be made that Toynbee Hall (building) and Toynbee Hall (charity) should be separate articles. As far as I could see the charity started in 1898 with the legal advice centre, and there was certainly plenty of interesting history of the building before then (e.g. Marconi).

I noted one point about language on Talk:Toynbee Hall, since you reverted some of my changes. Generally, encyclopedic writing has to stick close to verifiable facts, and to adopt an appropriate tone.

I'd like to think the article(s) could be improved somewhat from where it is now. Please consider using Talk:Toynbee Hall before going ahead further, since that is the standard forum. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've moved your contribution down to User talk:Charles Matthews#Toynbee Hall. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply