Welcome

edit
Hello, Alexia thomas15, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Alexia thomas15, good luck, and have fun.Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 17:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Professor Alexia Thomas. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Alexia Thomas

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Professor Alexia Thomas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Alexia Thomas

edit

Hello Alexia thomas15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Professor Alexia Thomas for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 17:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Professor Alexia Thomas for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Professor Alexia Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Alexia Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 18:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

Your username

edit

If you are not Alexia Thomas, when your block expires please apply at WP:Changing username for a new username. Under the Wikipedia:Username policy, using the name of another real person is considered misleading and, as you have found, can cause confusion. Your username may be based on your real name, or not, as you choose (see WP:REALNAME for some considerations), but it should not be the name of any other living person, or of any group or organization. JohnCD (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alexia Thomas (activist)

edit

Hi Alexia thomas15,

Thanks for your willingness to help wikipedia. However, Wikipedia do not permit people to write about themselves or someone they have personal connection with. Since you have a WP:COI in connection with the above subject, you may want to read this. If you are not Alexia Thomas, when your block expires please apply at WP:Changing username for a new username. Under the Wikipedia:Username policy. If you need help, do not hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Warm regards, Wikigyt@lk to M£ 11:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alexia Thomas (activist) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexia Thomas (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexia Thomas (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. H.dryad (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply