User talk:Alexyflemming/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Alexyflemming. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Nomination of 2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration for deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lfdder (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent editing history at Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

You, Δρ.Κ., are reverting a page with the claim that the edit is blatant original research!:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_Northern_Cyprus&diff=596951698&oldid=596951470

I wrote the following:
In 1986, the assembly of the Council of Europe decided to suspend the credentials of the Greek Cypriot Members of Parliament as representatives of Cyprus, thereby being the first international body to question the legitimacy of representation by Greek Cypriots only for the island of Cyprus in international affairs.^[1]^[2]^[3] In PACE, since 1997, the Greek Cypriots are represented by the Greek Cypriots chosen in the assembly of Cyprus, and the Turkish Cypriots are represented by the Turkish Cypriots chosen in the assembly of Northern Cyprus.

WP:OR means "Original Researchs offer an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political decision, and so on.". As is seen clearly, I gave 3 different sources, and I did not include my view of an event! Please research enough and then make interpretation! The Turkish Cypriots are represented in "Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe" by the Turkish Cypriots chosen in the assembly of Northern Cyprus. What do you not understand? Exactly where do you object?Alexyflemming (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Dr. K.'s Attitudes and "Polite" Language Towards Me

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

24.02.2014 19.10 Δρ.Κ.: Don't be silly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dr.K.&oldid=596955636&diff=prev Alexyflemming (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Before you open an attack thread about me on your tak, that was in response to your clueless edit on my talk with an attacking edit-summary: (In Wikipedia, you, Dr.K., do not have any right to delete the replies of other Wikipedians to each other! If you continue to delete my replies to other Wiki users, I will report the case to the Arbitration Committee.). Before you accuse people of erasing your comments and threaten them with arbitration action you should check the facts more closely because I had restored your reply already, before you came to my talk falsely accusing and threatening me. And you did not write my full edit summary: Don't be silly. I restored it soon after: Special:Diff/596946493. Why? Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 19:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Northern Cyprus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 14:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)