AlfonsoBourbonCream
Joined 29 August 2023
Latest comment: 4 months ago by ToBeFree in topic June 2024
June 2024
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Rather extreme? AlfonsoBourbonCream (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello AlfonsoBourbonCream, if you know what this is about and understand why it was a mistake, I'm perfectly fine with reducing the block duration from indefinite to something of your choice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for replying. :) Yes, I know what it's about, and I understand now that I should have attempted to calmly discuss the relevant content with the other user in the talk-page, rather than edit-warring. As regards to the block duration, perhaps 7 days? Maybe that's too much? I don't know.
- Thank you. AlfonsoBourbonCream (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much and no worries: It's 24 hours now and you may like to remove these messages from your talk page; they were for your information and our discussion and are not meant to be a wall of shame. Please remember to only use one single account when editing in the future, except of course in situations described at WP:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses. Welcome back (in 24 hours) and don't worry about it too much. All the mistakes that happened in this situation are relatively common. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello AlfonsoBourbonCream, if you know what this is about and understand why it was a mistake, I'm perfectly fine with reducing the block duration from indefinite to something of your choice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)