Alinsky1
May 2023
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Explicition (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Explicition (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am undoing edits by earlier blocked editor Annikacarina, who was blocked for adding libellous content to the site and turning it into some type of hate page against the author. This user has been blocked for doing so earlier and seems to be back. Alinsky1 (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Kajsa Ekis Ekman
editPlease stop removing cited information from the Kajsa Ekis Ekman page. Wikipedia is supposed to be encyclopedic, and that means it will include things you may not agree with. That does not make it libel either. Explicition (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- The problem with the cited information is that the sources do not show what the article claims they do, and that two of the sources have in themselves been sentenced for libel which do not make them reputable. Alinsky1 (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.