Welcome Alkaitagi!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 42,173,601 registered editors!
Hello Alkaitagi. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do keep cool!
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
    Fight vandalism
    Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
    Help contribute to articles
    Perform maintenance tasks
           
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Help design new templates
    Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
    Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, -Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)Reply

-Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of sourced content

edit

An advice: Hi, do not delete any content with sources. --Karthax (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I apologize if I've violated the rules. Can you point at the mistake, please? Alkaitagi (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey Karthax. Writing here regarding the Kaitag language page. I get it that deletion of sourced content is a bad thing, but what if the sources were updated? You've brought back the reference on Ethnologue page of Dargwa, but that was fixed a few months ago. No longer Kaitag is listed as a dialect on Ethnologue, and no longer Russian Academy of Sciences considers it to be a dialect either.

That's the first point. Secondly, you refer to "Peoples of USSR" to provide dialectal division. That source is obsolete compared to the latest 2000+ research by Russian Academy of Sciences.

Dear Karthax, I'm once again pointing you at the fact that the statement "The Ethnologue lists it under the dialects of Dargwa but recognizes that it may be a separate language" is not correct. Please, go to the Ethnologue Dargwa page and see yourself that Kaitag is no longer listed there as a dialect, it now has its own full page. Furthermore, "Until 1930 Kaitak was considered a distinct language" is also implying that it is still not a language, while here's the link to the latest 2022 registry of languages of Russian Federation by the Academy of Science. We can put that obsolete but sourced info into the History section, but I don't see how listing the old data right in the first paragraph can be a good thing.

I'm calling Sm8900 to arbitrate this situation in case I get something wrong. Alkaitagi (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

hi. I'm very pleased that you consider my input to be helpful in general; however, on this topic in particular, sorry, but I do not know enough about this topic to offer input. sorry. you may want to try the WP:Dispute Resolution pages. --Sm8900 (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm moving this discussion into the corresponding Wiki page.