Ally1023
Nice work!
editThe Original Barnstar | ||
You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Ally1023 (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Ally1023, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Ally1023! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
editPlease note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Anon126 (talk - contribs) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at AfC Topothesia was accepted
editThe article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Congratulations on your article being accepted!
editAnon126 (talk - contribs) has given you a cup of tea. Tea promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better.
Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, especially if it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!
Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:wikitea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I've taken a look at your article, and I've made a few improvements. However, I'd ask that you take a second look at some of your references:
- References to the Online Etymology Dictionary don't refer to the specific entry where the information is found, and I can't seem to figure them out. I've marked these like this:
{{sfn|Etymology|2014|loc=<!-- Specific entry -->}}{{nonspecific|date=March 2014}}
You'll notice I converted this to another shortened footnote. You can replace
with the name of the entry. After you've done that, you can remove <!-- Specific entry -->
{{nonspecific|...}}
(which is a tag marking an issue).
- I'm not sure which "Oxford Dictionary" you've cited. You can go down to the "References" section, where I've converted this into a
{{cite encyclopedia}}
reference, and fill in the information. (Don't worry about the "encyclopedia" bit; this is for dictionaries, too.) After this is fixed you can remove{{full|...}}
(another issue-marking tag).
If you don't feel like addressing these issues, that's fine. Wikipedia is voluntary, and perfection is not required. Thank you for your contributions! Anon126 (talk - contribs) 07:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)