Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Lahore (1800) has been accepted

edit
 
Siege of Lahore (1800), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 08:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sikh Invasion of Ganga-Yamuna has been accepted

edit
 
Sikh Invasion of Ganga-Yamuna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Ali Masjid (1839) has been accepted

edit
 
Battle of Ali Masjid (1839), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 08:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Sikh Invasion of Rohilkhand has been accepted

edit
 
Second Sikh Invasion of Rohilkhand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Goindval has been accepted

edit
 
Battle of Goindval, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Battle of Ali Masjid (1839) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Ali Masjid (1839) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ali Masjid (1839) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Battle of Goindval for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Goindval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Goindval until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 20:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Siege of Lahore (1800) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Lahore (1800) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Lahore (1800) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Second Sikh Invasion of Rohilkhand for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Sikh Invasion of Rohilkhand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Sikh Invasion of Rohilkhand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Battle of Ali Masjid (1839). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Imperial[AFCND] 11:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

i added sources which fit into WP:RAJ but why did the Other Guy Southasianhistory delete it? whats the reason? Alvin1783 (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
This warning is for your removal of the AFD notice here [1]. I am not responsible for other edits. Imperial[AFCND] 15:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Guru Tegh Bahadur

edit

Re this edit at Guru Tegh Bahadur: there is an ongoing discussion regarding the validity of the sources which you deleted. Please join the discussion at Talk:Guru Tegh Bahadur, but do not remove the material until consensus has been reached on the matter. As pointed out in the discussion, other material in the article relies on the presence of this material for context; removing it destroys the coherence of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Signing posts

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alvin1783,
You need to add your signature to all comments you make, including in AFD discussions. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit