Welcome

edit

Hello, Amaiamarruedo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons

edit

Only one of your images at commons has an OTRS pending tag. Those are usually good for 30 days or more. The other image may be deleted in 7 days if it isn't tagged as well. Make sure the company has the file names or urls in their email or OTRS won't be able to find them. See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS for details. If any problems arise then they have a noticeboard at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard The noticeboard would need file names or ticket numbers (once assigned by them) as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 12:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
water remote sensing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl t c 20:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Water Insight SPectrometer with 3 radiometers-for water quality (WISP-3), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Water Insight SPectrometer with 3 radiometers for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water Insight SPectrometer with 3 radiometers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Insight SPectrometer with 3 radiometers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Water insight spectrometer with three radiometers for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water insight spectrometer with three radiometers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water insight spectrometer with three radiometers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply