Amalia.crawford
Welcome!
editHello, Amalia.crawford, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Nikki DuBose, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Triptothecottage (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
left you a reply
editWhich you can read by clicking here -- WP:Requests_for_undeletion#Nikki_DuBose
As I explain over there, your changes were merely reverted (undone), the article itself was not deleted (which is what WP:REFUND administrators help with). I'm getting something undeleted, an article that used to exist but is now entirely gone, so I noticed your question.
If you have further questions about revert-versus-delete, best place to ask is WP:TEAHOUSE. You can also use WP:IRC if you like old-school internet chat forums better than the TeaHouse, it is sometimes a little faster.
Please read WP:PSCOI, as you are the publicist for Nikki DuBose, and follow the instructions there. WP:TEAHOUSE volunteers can help you out if you get stuck understanding that stuff. 47.222.203.135 (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Nikki DuBose copyright concern
editContent you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/15640577.Nikki_DuBose, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Amalia.crawford, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Amalia.crawford! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet investigation
editHi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amalia.crawford, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.