User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2011/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:AmandaNP. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Christmas Card
- -- DQ(t) [[Special:Emai(e) 03:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Mlpearc
Hey, I'm at the library and was trying to get to IRC. I was trying to log in from here. Doesn't work. Obviously not doing something :P Anyway running out of time only get 60mins. See ya L8r on IRC. Mlpearc Public (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
But the link you have at the top of this page worked :). Will steal it when I get home :P. Mlpearc Public (talk) 22:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- The connect vs. the regular link do two diff things, one is a client connector, one is webchat. -- DQ(t) [[Special:Emai(e) 02:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
Criminal Minds
The convention on the project is to list the main cast, and then to list supporting, or guest cast members, typically on their own page. What that sections boils down to is 1) highlighting a couple guest stars who achieved no more note or publicity than any other in the run of the show, and 2) makes it a defacto episode guide for those characters. You'd be hard pressed to find any other page to use as precedent for your edit. Many of a single sentence or paragraph dedicated to guest stars, but not paragraph upon paragraph outlining nearly every step the character took. The inclusion is excessive given the articles of similar shows and their handling of guest appearances. 99.169.250.133 (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe some of the information is a little excessive, but it doesn't call for blanking the whole thing. I am thinking about mabye a list of all the unsubs from Criminal Minds then just to get it out of the main article, but we should leave the other text for the time being as it's related to the show, and gives a point or two on what's going on in the show. I am not saying "Yes those guys are the most notable and should be there", I am saying that we shouldn't be removing good information. We could put more in if we want. -- DQ(t) [[Special:Emai(e) 13:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)