Ambedkaritebuddhist

Temporary block

You have been making some very major changes without seeking Wikipedia:Consensus, I will unblock you once I review what's been happening.--Konst.able 11:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I will keep you blocked for the remaining 3 hours for disruption. If you want the page moved discuss it on the talk page and try to reach some agreement first. I have move protected it, so now only admins can move it, this does not mean that it has to stay where it is but it does mean that you have to reach consensus, and show some admin that you have done so, before the page can be moved to anywhere.--Konst.able 11:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The name of the article Indian Caste System is not the right one. Hindus in India, Pakistan, USA everywhere has their CASTE System. India is a democratic country and our constitution believes in Equality and Casteless Society. You can not blame a nation for social discrimination. How can you says only Russian Racism Or American Racism? Racism is Rasicm all over world. same way Hindu Caste System is everywhere in the world. So we have to change the name of the article. Ambedkaritebuddhist 14:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Indian Buddhist Movement

I don't know why Hkelkar reverted your edits, but you should discuss with him, not with me. Blocking is a last resort: I'm not at all convinced Hkelkar did anything wrong. Don't make further requests of me until you have discussed the matter with him and understand what's going on. Mangojuice^talk 14:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not revert war on User talk:Hkelkar. You are only inviting a block. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 15:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hkelkar is not ready to discuss

The user Hkelkar has reverted his own talk page using pop-ups where I put Warning. This shows the user is not ready for any discussions and misguiding wikiusers by reverting his own talk page without any discussion.

HKelkar Talk Page Revert No. 1

HKelkar Talk Page Revert No. 2

HKelkar Talk Page Revert No. 3

HKelkar Talk Page Revert No. 4

I request administrators to take very strict action against Hkelkar. He is not following any directives nor ready for debate or discussions. Not even ready to debate. Reverting using pop ups. Within few hours he has reverted 4 times. His own talk page and not ready to discuss anything. Can you block him now? Ambedkaritebuddhist 15:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:3RR does not apply to user talk pages. I can revert your vandalism as many times as I want since I have established it as a personal attack thru the use of bogus vandalism tags.Hkelkar 15:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You have reverted valuable contents from Indian Buddhist Movement without any discussion. Even SOURCED material was reverted. I'll surely take this to administrators. Ambedkaritebuddhist 15:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Let me be crystal clear. I will take no action aganst Hkelkar for this. You have made no effort to discuss the changes. You do not own articles you contribute to, and treating his removal of your edits as vandalism is not an effort to engage in conversation. I find this kind of attempted manipulation of administrators very distateful. Mangojuice^talk 15:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I would also like to point out that revert warring on Hkelkar's talk page and adding false vandalism warnings may get you blocked yourself. Please read WP:VAND to understand what vandalism is - you and Hkelkar currently have a dispute over the content of the article which is best handled using our dispute resolution process. Any further vandalism warnings or attempts to Hkelkar blocked for vandalism may result in a block on your account to stop the disruption. Shell ^babelfish 21:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

reply

I will reply in my talk page only. Check it in a few minutes.Hkelkar 10:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Arbitration

Hello. If you feel that Hkelkar has been disruptive, you are free to add evidence to the arbitration case. Thanks. BhaiSaab ^talk 16:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

"Ambedkar and Brahmins" section

Why do you think the section should be moved to "Anti-Brahminism," after all, people like you believe that Ambedkar was against the Brahmins. Hindusthan is Hindusthan, not neo-buddhisthan.

The contents written are about anti-Brahmin attitude of Indian Buddhists. So we should put such content in Anti-Brahminism article. OK. Ambedkaritebuddhist 14:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Varahadeva

Please refrain from making pov remarks in regards to avatars of Vishnu such as Varaha. [1] Om Tat Sat, Ys, Gouranga(UK) 20:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Bahujan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bahujan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 23:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)