Ambro2000

Deleting sourced material for no reason

Why did you revert so much information from the Ulf Samuelsson article? These are two of the most significant events from his NHL career. You cannot simply revert sourced material without an explanation. We don't take the time to search out and provide reliable sources for our edits just to have someone come along and revert the material with no explanation for their actions. The material is 100% true, which I'm sure you know, and the citations are provided. You can start a discussion on the talk page if you feel the article would be improved by the exclusion of this information. Thanks. Freshfighter9^talk 12:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

There is already a discussion going on in the talk page about putting way to much focus on the little incident with Cam Neely. If you feel like it you can put it on the Neely page since it's a big part of his career.

I don't believe what you're referring to could be described as a discussion. It's one person's opinion. Mentioning the incident can not be seriously regarded as "focused to much" on the incident. You need to gain consensus before you just unilaterally revert properly sourced information.Freshfighter9^talk 13:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Read the swedish wiki page about Samuelsson and you get a much better wikipage. The Neely incident is only a big part for Neely and his career, not for Ulf. Therefor you should put on the Neely page, not Samuelssons. I might translate the swedish page at some point...

I strongly disagree. And by the way, you are now in violation of the three revert rule, which warrants a block of your editing privileges.Freshfighter9^talk 13:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)