Amerkhdababneh

June 2021

Hello Amerkhdababneh. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ominvest, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amerkhdababneh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amerkhdababneh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ominvest, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 08:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

13 June 2021

Thanks for the messages, We are editing on behalf of Ominvest and we the paid template inside talk page. Also we reomved the referances pdf.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amerkhdababneh (talk • contribs) 07:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

We are just trying to update outdated information. Please advice on how we can do so?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amerkhdababneh (talk • contribs) 08:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Amerkhdababneh, thanks for disclosing this. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for promotion, and you may tell your client exactly that. Any editor with a conflict of interest (paid or not paid) is strongly discouraged from editing the article directly.

In case you want to make neutral changes, please use the {{request edit}}-template on the article's talk page, or use the edit-request wizard. These changes need to be sourced with independent, reliable sources. Also they are not allowed to contain copyrighted content. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

: Thanks for your response.