Amgauna
Welcome!
editHello, Amgauna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Big data has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. McSly (talk) 04:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Wilson Witzel has a new comment
edit
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
@Diannaa: You're completely mistaken. I am a Senior Business Systems Analyst. The text that I put refers to the official manual, was relative to the RDF Triple Case of SPARQL. The text I have put contains all the references in the official manual. There is no copyright infringement. The lady made the removal of the text wrongly. Who is wrong is you. I totally disagree with what you did. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Whether it's an official document or not is immaterial - the source webpage enjoys copyright protection, so it's not okay to copy it here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
@Diannaa: You are mistaken, and you are wrong to have excluded the information I put. By the legislation in force, people can simulate texts, they can quote parts of books, they can quote parts of technical manual, but to do so, you have to be informed of the original source of the text. I have not disobeyed the copyright laws in force. I have reported what is the RDF, I have informed you what IRI and I have quoted the original text sources. I put in a technical explanation that you have wrongly removed. I quoted all the source of the text with fonts. Ana Gauna (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Fonte: (SPARQL) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARQL
- Fonte: (RDF) https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework
- Fonte: (IRI) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_Resource_Identifier
- Fonte: (SPARQL Tutorial) https://jena.apache.org/tutorials/sparql.html
- Fonte: (SPARQL 1.1 Query Language) https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
- Fonte: (SPARQL Query Language for RDF) https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
- Fonte: (API Apache Jena) http://jena.apache.org/tutorials/rdf_api.html
- Fonte: (WC3) (IRI) https://www.w3.org/International/O-URL-and-ident.html
- Fonte: IBM.COM (IBM Knowledge Center) (Internationalized Resource Identifiers - IRI) https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSGMCP_5.2.0/com.ibm.cics.ts.internet.doc/topics/dfhtl_atom_iri.html
- Wikipedia has a very strict copyright policy, stricter in some ways than copyright law itself, because our fair use policy does not allow us to copy material from copyright sources when there's a freely licensed alternative available. In this case the freely licensed material is prose that we write ourselves. You must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. To do otherwise is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
@Diannaa: What you just told me violates the copyright legislation that is in force. For a person to use something that is attached to a brand, that is connected to something that a person has created and written, the original source has to always mentioned. I can not write the text of the contents of this manual with my words, it was not I who created the manual, what I can do with my words is to put (in brackets) the explanation of some technical term that exists within the manual, or create an extra paragraph containing the explanation of what the technical term is. This is to put in brackets (or within links calling other pages of Wikipedia) the explanation of technical terms, is already used in various technical texts that are online on Wikipedia. I read again the Wikipedia copyright rules Wikipedia:Copyrights. I read that the Paris_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Industrial_Property and Berne Convention are both a law of 1886, at that time the internet had not yet existed. What is the law that was created in the 70's (internet era) that is in effect regulating these internet licenses in use on Wikipedia? No standard is above existing legislation. Ana Gauna (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has a very strict copyright policy, stricter in some ways than copyright law itself. You must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. If you are not able to rephrase the material, don't add it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Wilson Witzel has a new comment
edit @Robert McClenon: and @Bkissin: The second round of the elections in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) will be on October 28, 2018, Wilson Witzel and Eduardo Paes are running as candidates for Governor of the State of Rio de Janeiro. In election polls Witzel appeared weak with little popularity. But after finishing the first round vote on October 7, 2018 was to everyone's surprise, Wilson Witzel won more votes than Eduardo Paes. On the 28th he will have a new election (second round), whoever wins the most votes will be the new governor of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Ana Gauna (talk) 12:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/08/bolsonaro-allies-ride-conservative-wave-in-brazil-elections
- https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/10/08/world/americas/ap-lt-brazil-elections-surprises.html
@Robert McClenon: and @Bkissin: On October 28, 2018, in the second round of the [general elections in Brazil], Wilson Witzel [[Partido Social Cristão | PSC] reached the mark of 59.87% of the valid votes (4,675,355 votes) being in first place and elected new Governor of the State of Rio de Janeiro with a mandate of 4 years from January / 2019; against 40.13% valid votes (3,134,400 votes) by Eduardo Paes, from DEM. Wilson Witzel was elected Governor of the State of Rio de Janeiro, with a term of 4 years, he will replace Luiz Fernando Pezão in January/2019. Ana Gauna (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- https://g1.globo.com/rj/rio-de-janeiro/eleicoes/2018/noticia/2018/10/28/governador-eleito-do-rj-wilson-witzel-concede-entrevista-coletiva.ghtml?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=share-bar-smart&utm_campaign=share-bar&fbclid=IwAR3U7Le9dzAvWpcZYKibvwb1GHDO9iYXRbhffWHmyp7dsuuZAmupFFzVwYk
- https://noticias.r7.com/importadas/eleicoes-2018-quem-e-wilson-witzel-o-juiz-que-venceu-a-eleicao-de-governador-do-rio-com-discurso-radical-29102018
- https://g1.globo.com/rj/rio-de-janeiro/eleicoes/2018/noticia/2018/10/28/wilson-witzel-do-psc-e-eleito-governador-do-rj.ghtml
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Witzel has been accepted
edit The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 20:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Wilson Wetzel
editI moved the article on Wetzel back to draft space, but hope that it can go back into article space within 48 hours. It has two problems. First, the AFC comments about the election and the acceptance of the article were not stripped out, and are still in the article. Second, the article has verb tense problems reflecting that it was written before the second-round final election. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (J. B. Tanko) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating J. B. Tanko.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The History section should be broken up into sub-sections and should probably be retitled "Biography"
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 07:09, 16 January 2019 (UTC)