AmourReflection

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Fractional reserve banking. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

It is quite clear at this point that you are not interested in genuinely improving the encyclopedia. You are welcome to request an unblock (see instructions above), but I think you'd have quite a hurdle to jump in convincing another admin that you're going to follow the rules in the future. —Darkwind (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmourReflection (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am following the rules, please see all my comments as "Tsar Bomba" in the talk section. The editors are white-washing constructive entry's, I made zero reverts today. I'd like to know the precise reason why I am being blocked. Thank you.Tsar Bomba (talk) 02:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I lost count at somewhere around 38 reverts to the article today. If your next unblock request is this daft, I will remove your access to this page; there is no need to waste any more of our time with this. Kuru (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmourReflection (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Lifting the curtain of Oz.Tsar Bomba (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblock.John Reaves 23:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic