AnAimlessRoad
Welcome
edit
|
April 2012
editWelcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Holocaust denial are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Eustace Mullins, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shrike (talk) 06:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Edits such as this [1] are not acceptable as they go against WP:NPOV--Shrike (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
I see you have already been advised to stop treating Wikipedia as a forum for general discussion, but I'll reiterate. This edit[2], which contains not an iota of actionable information or evidence, amounts to using Wikipedia as a platform for the promotion of your fringe theories on the subject. The suggestion that other editors are getting paid for their work is an inflammatory accusation of bad faith. The use of religious slurs and propensity for attempting to "out" another editor's religious affiliation is similarly inappropriate.[3] I would direct you to read WP:ASG and WP:CIVIL, but given your familiarity with Wikipedia shorthand, I have a feeling you already know this stuff. I suggest you stop.Homunculus (duihua) 14:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Arbitration Enfocement
editA request has been filed against you here[4]. —Zujine|talk 21:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion . Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Note: although I made this block in response to an AE report here, this block is explicitly not an AE block, and may be reviewed by another admin as a standard block. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)