Anderson12
Welcome
editHello, Anderson12, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ardenn 04:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Ardenn 04:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Ardenn 04:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ardenn 04:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ardenn 04:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- User: Ardenn has violated 3 Revert Rule by deleting edit. Also violated Vandalism rule by offering no explanation for deletion. Request user banning from editing topic.
Blocked for 24 hours for 3RR violation.
editYou have been blocked for 24 hours for a 3RR violation on Freemasonry. Ral315 (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Just an additional note; if you wish to contact me regarding this block, you can do so via this talk page or my E-mail address. Ral315 (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I DID NOT VIOLATE 3rr rule. Learn to count. The rule is MORE than three times. I edited THREE TIMES, Ardenn edited FOUR times, which is a violation.Anderson12 07:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I maintain that your first edits were enough to push you to 4 reverts. Nevertheless, you were gaming 3RR even if you didn't break it, and your incivility (referring to Ardenn's reverts as 'vandalism', dogging Ardenn, etc.), and so the 24 hour block remains. Ral315 (talk) 07:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Either I violated the 3revert rule or I didn't. Either [Ardenn] violated the 3 revert rule or he didn't. He deleted my edit FOUR times. I wasn't "gaming" anything. I didn't "dog" Arden I made a complaint that he had violated the 3 revert rule, that he had committed vandalizing by accusing me of vandalizing in the summary, of making deletions with no reason given, of making accusations of sockpuppet on my user page, of threatening to have me banned from Wikipedia, and of deleting the notice of 3rr complaint I had posted on his talk page. I will now re-make the complaint against that user as well as file a complaint against you for abusing your administrator privledges.Anderson12 07:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's certainly your right. Ral315 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- I may not agree with what you are saying, but since you are a new user, I'll point you to the dispute resolution process. Ardenn 13:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- I find it quite ironic that you post this link to the dispute resolution now, considering you didn't follow it in your deletions of my edits, your false accusations of 3rr, your threats to 'have me banned' from wikipedia, and your high fiving it when this admin made his strange ruling. I take it by your actions that you are a Freemason.Anderson12 04:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- I may not agree with what you are saying, but since you are a new user, I'll point you to the dispute resolution process. Ardenn 13:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's certainly your right. Ral315 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Either I violated the 3revert rule or I didn't. Either [Ardenn] violated the 3 revert rule or he didn't. He deleted my edit FOUR times. I wasn't "gaming" anything. I didn't "dog" Arden I made a complaint that he had violated the 3 revert rule, that he had committed vandalizing by accusing me of vandalizing in the summary, of making deletions with no reason given, of making accusations of sockpuppet on my user page, of threatening to have me banned from Wikipedia, and of deleting the notice of 3rr complaint I had posted on his talk page. I will now re-make the complaint against that user as well as file a complaint against you for abusing your administrator privledges.Anderson12 07:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- I maintain that your first edits were enough to push you to 4 reverts. Nevertheless, you were gaming 3RR even if you didn't break it, and your incivility (referring to Ardenn's reverts as 'vandalism', dogging Ardenn, etc.), and so the 24 hour block remains. Ral315 (talk) 07:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- I DID NOT VIOLATE 3rr rule. Learn to count. The rule is MORE than three times. I edited THREE TIMES, Ardenn edited FOUR times, which is a violation.Anderson12 07:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for all your work on the article! I was wondering though, have you tried using the Show preview button before saving? It makes working with images a lot easier so you don't have to make many little changes to get them just the way you like. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 18:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Just so you know... if you add back your POV vandalism one more time, it will be a 3rrr violation on your part. Blueboar 19:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
editI've blocked you [1] for WP:3RR on freemasonry, and as a probable Lighbringer sock William M. Connolley 20:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Unblocked; apologies William M. Connolley 20:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry; bit of a mess; my apologies, but you're blocked as a probable sock William M. Connolley 21:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- The "evidence" provided by User: MSJapan in his accusations of me being a 'sock' are laughable. Yes took an interest in the information on the repeatedly deleted Freemasonry Scratchpad. So what? The Freemasonry article is in serious need of a re-write and needs information balancing it out. I never made any accusation of MSJapan being a sock, that is an outright lie. The accusation that my edits are similar to a banned user are also bizarre. I assume the banned user was a critics of Masonry. The criticisms of Masonry are generic and widely available. If the article on Freemasonry is to be balanced then obviously the most common criticms of Freemasonry need to be included. I was not "disrupting" the Freemasonry page as you claim, I was trying to make it a NPOV article, something the Masonic editors are loath to accept. Did I make a 3rr complaint against a Masonic editor? Yes! Why? Because he deleted by edit FOUR TIMES! What kind of an Admin are you anyways? The reason you can not prove I am the sock of any banned user, is because I am not one! I demand you immediately remove my block as well as all the ridiculous speculative suppositions that I am a 'sock' from my user page, and your own.Anderson12 15:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- You're in no position to make demands, but if you talk nicely we may get somewhere. You are blocked for your editing pattern and for checkuser evidence [2] that makes you look like Basil Rathbone. William M. Connolley 16:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- What "editing pattern" would that be? Trying to make the Freemasonry article NPOV? The information that is critical of Freemasonry is generic, it is widespread, and it needs to be included in the article. Every individual who makes edits to that page gets accused of beign a 'sock' of some previous banned user. The "evidence" provided? None. I can't prove a negative. Did I violate any Wikipedia guidelines? No. I made an edit critical of Freemasonry and it was deleted four times. I made a complaint of 3rr. The result is I got blocked for 3rr! Why? The Admin didn't say other than I might be a sock of a banned user, but the reason he gave was 3rr. I didn't violate 3rr! I edited only three times! I complained to Admin but received no response. Now I have you making a ridiculous ban of me again with absolutely no evidence offered. Are you a Mason? Are you an Occultist? Who knows, who can know. There has to be a higher standard than this for getting banned other than "possible sock"!!!!Anderson12 18:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- You're in no position to make demands, but if you talk nicely we may get somewhere. You are blocked for your editing pattern and for checkuser evidence [2] that makes you look like Basil Rathbone. William M. Connolley 16:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Images
editHello, regarding these images you uploaded:
- Image:Masonsigns1.gif
- Image:Masonsigns2.gif
- Image:Masonsigns3.gif
- Image:Masonsigns4.gif
- Image:Mason penalsigns.gif
- Image:Mary bleeding tears.jpg
They have no source. Please provide a source or they will be deleted in seven days. Mushroom (Talk) 14:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)