Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Andrei.computer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Shadowjams (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
You probably moved too fast with this. You need at least one independent source to indicate a subject's Wikipedia:Notability. I see something of this name appear in a few blogs, which are generally not considered the most reliable sources. It might mention a sentence or two in the calculator article? W Nowicki (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not sure what you are asking. The one source listed is a download link, and from that I can verify that there is indeed a zip file there to download. If you read the like above, it says" if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. " The download link is not independent, and not "third party". There certainly might be some, but the burden of proof would be on the person proposing the article to show at least one. There are millions of "apps" and other software that people can download, and alas, WIkipedia can only cover the ones that are noted by someone besides the authors. I do try to help new authors, but other editors are quicker on the deletion unless you give them some evidence. Thanks for your patience. W Nowicki (talk) 20:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply