AndrewC

Welcome!

Hello, AndrewC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Cheers, -- Infrogmation 3 July 2005 16:33 (UTC)

Notability of Ivan Mindlin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ivan Mindlin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ivan Mindlin seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ivan Mindlin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

gospels

Andrew, several weeks ago, an eager new editor led a campaign to "balance" the gospel articles by treating the academic view and the traditional view roughly equally. You and I know that this sort of thing happens all the time. It's been a couple weeks now, and I've started to move in and get things back to rights. Any time you could spend pitching in, or correcting me if I go to far, would be appreciated. Leadwind (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes Andrew please take a look. He deleted a large number of citations and sourced material because he labels it "sectarian".RomanHistorian (talk) 07:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)