Andrew Lowe Watson
Hello, Andrew Lowe Watson, and welcome to Wikipedia.
- Helpful links
- Editing || Writing a great article || Naming and Merging || Style Manual || Policies
Reassigning old edits || What Wikipedia is not
- Maintenance
- Deleting articles || all maintenance tasks (see also open tasks, below)
Uploading images: please note the origins and copyright status of every image you upload.
- To sign your comments, type four tildes like this: ~~~~.
- This automatically adds your name and the current time.
I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian on en:. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. You can also leave questions on my talk page. :)
Regards, BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-13 02:52
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Hello, I've moved your autobiography to your User page at User:Andrew Lowe Watson. Please see WP:BIO and WP:VAIN. Zoe 07:03, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Please don't regard Zoe's statements as the final opinion. Zoe has referred to 2 Wikipedia guidelines, not policies. The only requirement for your article is that the contents remain neutral (ie: no vanity/self-praising), and are verifiable from external sources. Since you have an article in the Independent, which is more than many biographies on Wikipedia can say, I think your article is alright to keep. I'll restore it and try to clean up any problems I see. Don't be too worried about following others' opinions of what the "rules" are around here. Feel free to write new articles or expand smaller ones as you wish. — 0918BRIAN • 2005-12-14 01:49
License tagging for Image:Ridlington church.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Ridlington church.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Ridlington Church.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Ridlington Church.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ralph Vaughan Williams.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Ralph Vaughan Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Tippett 2nd Symphony LP cover.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tippett 2nd Symphony LP cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Andrew. I don't know if you are still active here, or whether you check messages from time to time. If you do, this is by way of letting you know that over the next few weeks I hope to be revising, expanding and polishing the Tippett article which, at the moment, is very substantially your work. I haven't started work on the text yet, as I have been developing the List of compositions into a complete list of published and unpublished works. I have been a main contributor to several other English composers, including Benjamin Britten, Gustav Holst and Frederick Delius, and some non-English ones as well – Mahler, Bizet and Smetana. Please feel free to comment on the Tippett revisions as the work proceeds, on the talk or at my own talkpage. Brianboulton (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was delighted by your message on my talk, and am very sorry to hear of your health problems. Working on the Tippett article has been a labour of love; as a very young student in January 1975 I attended the 70th birthday performance of Child at the RFH. By chance Tippett was sitting just a couple of rows ahead of me in the hall. I didn't meet him, but the work itself, and the near proximity of its creator, forged a kind of bond which has lasted ever since. I am not a Tippett idolator; I don't enjoy all the music by any means, but I have enormous regard for the man. My researches in relation to the article have been greatly helped by the base that you created – you will find bits of your own prose lurking in various corners – and for that I am most grateful. The article is about 80% complete; I still have to write a section on the late compositions, then go through the whole thing getting rid of verbosities, repetitions etc, hopefully to achieve a tight 8,500 words or so. I repeat my invitation above – contact me any time you wish with your thoughts and suggestions. With all good wishes, Brianboulton (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- PS I should point out that the Britten article was much more the work of my colleague Tim riley than it was mine. We also worked together on the Delius and Holst articles. Brianboulton (talk) 22:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Just updating you: the Tippet article has now been nominated for review at WP:FAC as a potential featured article. I hope it will follow in the footsteps of Britten, Holst et al, and would like to thank you again for your groundwork upon which the article was built. Brianboulton (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tippett 2nd Symphony 1.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Tippett 2nd Symphony 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tippett Pastorale.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Tippett Pastorale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Walton in 1928.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Walton in 1928.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
