Andy9596
Knockout stage
editThe knockout stage was a single-elimination tournament involving the sixteen teams that qualified from the group stage of the tournament. There were four rounds of matches, with each round eliminating half of the teams entering that round. The successive rounds were: Round of 16, quarter-finals, semi-finals, final. There was also a play-off to decide third/fourth place. For each game in the knockout stage, a draw was followed by thirty minutes of extra time (two fifteen minute halves); if scores were still level there would be a penalty shootout (at least five penalties each, and more if necessary) to determine who progressed to the next round. Scores after extra time are indicated by (a.e.t.), and penalty shoot outs are indicated by (pen.).
Round of 16 | Quarter-finals | Semi-finals | Final | |||||||||||
Clachnacudin | 0 | |||||||||||||
Keith | 2 | |||||||||||||
Keith | 3 | |||||||||||||
Buckie Thistle | 0 | |||||||||||||
Buckie Thistle | ||||||||||||||
Bye | ||||||||||||||
Keith | 0 | |||||||||||||
Fraserburgh | 2 | |||||||||||||
Fraserburgh | 6 | |||||||||||||
Forres Mechanics | 3 | |||||||||||||
Fraserburgh | 2 | |||||||||||||
Brora Rangers | 0 | |||||||||||||
Fort William | 0 | |||||||||||||
Brora Rangers | 1 | |||||||||||||
Fraserburgh | 1 | |||||||||||||
Inverurie Loco Works | 2 | |||||||||||||
Lossiemouth | 2 | |||||||||||||
Wick | 5 | |||||||||||||
Wick | 2 | |||||||||||||
Inverurie Loco Works | 4 | |||||||||||||
Inverurie Loco Workspen | 3(6) | |||||||||||||
Cove | 3(5) | |||||||||||||
Inverurie Loco Works | 5 | |||||||||||||
Nairn County | 1 | Third place | ||||||||||||
Rothes | 3 | |||||||||||||
Nairn County | 5 | |||||||||||||
Nairn County | 2 | |||||||||||||
Deveronvale | 0 | |||||||||||||
Deveronvale | 4 | |||||||||||||
Huntly | 2 | |||||||||||||
File copyright problem with File:ICFC LOGO.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:ICFC LOGO.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Icfc logo.JPG
editThanks for uploading File:Icfc logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SouthKilburn.gif
editThanks for uploading File:SouthKilburn.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:BAFL seasons
editTemplate:BAFL seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of London Junior Cup for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Junior Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Junior Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of 1998–99 Scottish Junior Cup for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1998–99 Scottish Junior Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998–99 Scottish Junior Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor Talk 02:16, 1 November 2020 (UTC)