Anglocatholichinge

Welcome!

Hello, Anglocatholichinge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting Started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Anglocatholichinge, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Anglocatholichinge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Personal ordinariate article.

Please stop your repeated unconstructive editing. You have already been informed by three other editors about not using personal blogs as references but you continue to restore them. This is unacceptable. Anglicanus (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

You're removing far more than blogs. Take a look at the substance of my edits and reasons for it. If blog citations are what you really have a problem with, then limit yourself to simply removing the blog citations and I won't re-add them. It's the substance I care about. Furthermore, you've removed non-blog citations as well, so they've been re-added. Anglocatholichinge (talk) 27 December 2013 (UTC)

You were informed by me and two other editors not to include unreliable sources such as personal blogs but you kept on adding them back when they were removed. If you think that I have nothing better to do with my time than to spend it fixing your problematic editing then you are mistaken. Any editing by you which includes such unacceptable sources will be reverted. It's up to you make sure they don't in the first place. Anglicanus (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Lol, to avoid you having to waste your time my latest edits have avoided blogs as sources. You're welcome. Anglocatholichinge (talk) 27 December 2013 (UTC)

And "about bloody time" as we say in Australia! Anglicanus (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)