AngryBirdsGO!!

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arturo Vidal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arturo Vidal was changed by AngryBirdsGO!! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957962 on 2016-02-01T01:10:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yellowfin tuna. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yellowfin tuna was changed by AngryBirdsGO!! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970185 on 2016-02-01T01:11:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AngryBirdsGO!! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

PLEASE!! 3 EDITS IS NO BLOCK UNBLOCK PLEASE

Decline reason:

OH YES IT IS. NO. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.