Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Animatronic Fruit Loop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 18:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jane Aagaard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jane Aagaard was changed by Animatronic Fruit Loop (u) (t) deleting 7925 characters on 2009-09-28T18:21:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Heya. Noticed you're putting a good amount of articles up for deletion, and it appears you're doing everything right - but if anything, I'm curious, because this is a new account. Do you have another account here on Wikipedia? If so, you may want to consider the {{User Alternate Acct}} template to help clarify things. Thanks! --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

May I also suggest you slow down a little. Myself, I have some experience here, but it usually takes me a while to make a thorough check for sources and consider alternatives according to WP:BEFORE. I remind you the rule is unsourceable, not presently unsourced. DGG ( talk ) 11:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is obviously one of the deletion fanatics creating an account to do the good work filtering out content. Well good luck it, may take you 20 years to go through the encyclopedia from A-Z. We could certainly do with a clear out in many parts but I would recommend going through categories rather than A-Z. Himalayan 11:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fancruft would be a useful area for you to work on. There's lots of dross there that we could do without. Xxanthippe (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC).Reply
Or go through categories on articles about Pakistani and Indian people. You'll find a lot of articles ten times worse than your recent nominations.. Himalayan 13:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

A Response

edit

Well thank you all for your messages! I have had an account on the wikipedia previously, I cannot remember its name because for a lot of this time I was high on drugs all the time, which cause many an issue for me and my life. These days I am clean, but the way I find I contribute best is to overturn BLP violations and remove dangerous and unreferenced articles. I have taken note of your comments and hopefully my nominations of deletion will be a bit more read: and I will certainly find out about BEFORE!!!

I am not going to just delete the articles on Pakistani and Indian people: this would be a bit like Hitler removing the articles of Jewish people! Well, I kid, but only a bit!

So no, I'm happy, and let this be the second day of my 20 years of purgatory. May we all come through it cleaner and better people.

Yours, Animatronic Fruit Loop (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply