Your submission at Articles for creation: Alankrit Borthakur (January 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
C.Fred (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Ankur Borthakur123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —C.Fred (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johnny Sins (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Johnny Sins

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Johnny Sins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johnny Sins (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Assam Medical College have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Assam Medical College, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Assam Medical College, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alia Bhatt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alia Bhatt

edit

Alia Bhatt is Indian not British Ankur Borthakur123 (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ankur_Borthakur123 reported by User:Krimuk2.0 (Result: ). Thank you. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Don't insert your personal opinions into articles

edit

  Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 16:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you wish to be unblocked, your appeal will have to explain what you think you were doing with this edit. There are other issues with your editing, but that will be the place to start. --NeilN talk to me 16:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alia Bhatt

edit

Alia Bhatt is not British.She is Indian.She was born in India,Punjab.It is clearly stated there.But nationality is stated as British Ankur Borthakur123 (talk) 15:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

According to what reliable sources? Since there's one clearly cited in the article that states, "She is a British passport holder, and, therefore, does not have Indian citizenship."[1] Also, there's no excuse for your incivility of your message in the comment at that paragraph. —C.Fred (talk) 23:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply