June 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of tallest buildings in Mumbai. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! AnmolSingh0019, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


August 2012

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of tallest buildings in India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 13:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

December 2012

edit

I notice you have recently made many edits to various articles about tall buildings in south Asia. While I believe you are doing these edits in good faith, it makes it much harder for me and other editors to be sure of this if you make your edits without any explanation in the edit summary. On the few occasions when you have provided an edit summary, it is not really helpful to say "list edit" or "paragraph edit".

A couple of examples: this edit removed four buildings from a list - was it vandalism, are they no longer on hold, maybe you think they are not notable for inclusion in the list - who knows? Fortunately, it is things like the correct removal of the proposed Kingdom Tower from the under construction list, that makes me think you are doing this in good faith, but once again no edit summary leaves me guessing as to your motives. Astronaut (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivarea concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivarea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivarea

edit
 

Hello AnmolSingh0019. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vivarea".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivarea}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply