Welcome!

Hello, Anna reg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DS 01:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

How I saw your picture of the solar tree

edit

I saw it in my regular re-search and re-opening of the wikipedia's photovoltaics page.

It's for work reasons and also my beloved obsessions, now focused on the sun, and the devices to capture their energy.

As I am just very lazy and forgetful I didn't want to check up how to properly write links here. Something I knew well some time ago but left my mind after some un-use. Even being a big lover of wikipedia and wiki for nearly all, I just forget. I used to read daily a lot of wikipedia and was near to doing some software wiki project, but since sometime I am surprisingly working and using it only for finding nice links and work info, which is a less wikipedia-loving activity, no time to love, only do do do. Just one "do" in my case. Sometimes, as now, I like to do no hyperjobs at all. Call it tradition, or senseless temporal inefficiencies.

Anyways, thanks again (to you! not me) and I'll be in your country, Freiburg, for a big solar fair the 20th of june. There, if lucky, I might return you some photos of sun loving machines to compete with your beautiful tree.

Bye! Pablo2garcia 15:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Hybrid tea double delight.jpg

edit

Sure, go right ahead! -- Marumari (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Henri Lédéchaux (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ile-de-France
List of rose breeders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter Lambert

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosa 'Violet Carson', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Floribunda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosa 'Arthur Bell' may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ref> In 2001, the sport was granted the [[Royal Horticultural Society]]'s [[Award of Garden Merit]]].<ref>[http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.16929 'Arthur Bell, Cl.' on helpmefind.com]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosa 'Ingrid Bergman' may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • dark green, semi-glossy foliage. The cultivar is heat and rain tolerant, winter hardy up to -30°C ([[USDA Zone|USDA 4b]], and very disease resistant.<ref>[http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Europa-Rosarium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and ''[[ADR rose|ADR-Garden]]''.<ref name=clark /> The rose cultivar 'Sangerhauser Jubiläumsrose' ([[W. Kordes' Söhne|Kordes]] is named by [[Minister-President]] of [[Saxony-Anhalt]] [[Wolfgang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:37, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 18:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosa 'Queen Sirikit', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 11 August

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Anna reg (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Roses

edit

Hi Anna! Wow, that's quite a task you set for yourself! I'm all for polishing some cultivars up, since that would be targeted and not much work because there are so few famous ones. On the other hand, overhauling an article like garden roses might be much more rewarding since it is actually looked at by at least by a few hundread people each day. Making rose presentable would be the best claim to Wiki fame, but where to start there?! The university library I go to is actually great, so if I had time I would work on this :( Please keep me updated on what you want to do. Best regards Hekerui (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ich fühl mich blöd auf Englisch zu schreiben, wenn wir beide Muttersprachler sind, wie ich grad sehe, aber natürlich ist das auf dem Wiki hier korrekter :) Übrigens, ich habe eine Rose 'Camelot' gepflanzt letzten Monat und sie hatte wunderbare Blüten und ich Dämel hab natürlich kein Foto gemacht für Commons. Ist mir erst eingefallen nachdem sie verblüht waren, verflucht. Grüße Hekerui (talk) 21:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ich muss zugeben, dass ich nicht nachgeschaut hatte, welche Sprachen du sprichst (auf commons mach ich das immer, aber hier ist ja anzunehmen, dass Englisch ok ist).
Wie du selber sagst, die Rosensorten überarbeiten sollte eigentlich nicht allzu schwer sein - einmal auf jeden fall zu start, teilweise vielleicht zu C-class (und mehr wird aus denen glaub ich normal auch nicht). Ich hab [(in meiner Sandkiste)] mal eine Liste der Sorten gemacht, die meiner Meinung nach dringend zu überarbeitenden sind (die ersten sind alle Weltrosen - von denen viele noch gar keinen Artikel haben, aber das ist für mich erst einmal zweitrangig). Dann bin ich noch ein bisschen bei Rose garden und den einzelnen Gärten am basteln - nachdem ich da auch im deutschen Artikel schon ein bisschen was geschrieben hab und also ein paar Quellen aufgetrieben hab (eine gute Leitlinie für Gärten, die im Hauptartikel vorkommen sollten, ist meiner Meinung nach die Liste der 42 Gardens of Excellence - von der World Organisation of Rose Societies.
Ah ja, Sortenlisten (z.B. List of Award of Garden Merit roses) versuch ich teilweise auch zu ergänzen - auch wenn ich nicht glaube, dass außer dem Rose Hall of Fame (hab ich grad umgestaltet - was sagst du dazu?) einer im Buch sinnvoll ist (das vielleicht in ein Rosen-Übersichtsbuch und ein Gartenrosen-Buch aufgeteilt gehört - weiß nicht recht... zur Zeit hat's knapp 400 Seiten).
Bei den Rosenarten kenne ich mich dagegen bis jetzt nur sehr wenig aus und hab also noch kaum etwas gemacht.
Zu Rose und Garden roses - ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass ich Kleinigkeiten mache, wie die Links mal überprüfen oder ein Kapitel ergänzen, aber sonst sind mir die etwas zu aufwenig... das braucht nämlich ziemlich viel Zeit auf einmal - nicht so kleine überschaubare Änderungen wie die Rosensorten ;-> - auch wenn's natürlich schön wäre, wenn aus den zwei irgendwann mal gute Artikel entstehen...
In den nächsten 10 Tagen werd ich allerdings nichts weitermachen - da bin ich selber unterwegs (vielleicht schaff ich ja ein paar Photos von Rosen - die gibt's ja nicht nur im eigenen Garten ;->)
Liebe Grüße, Anna— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna reg (talkcontribs)
Hi. War kein Vorwurf. Und auch das mit den Seiten: ich wollte nur zum Ausdruck bringen dass an den Sorten was zu machen eine schöne Idee ist, weil es nicht so viel Arbeit wär, aber dass die wichtigen Seiten viel mehr Arbeit bräuchten, obwohl die sich mehr lohnen würde. Also, nur für die Zukunft, da mach ich gern mit sobald ich (und du) mehr Zeit haben. Wir können auch gern zu Englisch zurückkehren, ich fand es nur interessant, dass wir uns auf Englisch schreiben, was sonst nicht passieren würde. Beste Grüße Hekerui (talk) 23:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hab ich zu verteidigend geklungen? Ich wüsst eigentlich nicht genau, warum... ;-> angegriffen gefühlt hab ich mich überhaupt nicht - eher gefreut, dass du dich meldest. So ausführlich hab ich vor allem geschrieben, weil du gemeint hast, dass ich dich gern auf dem Laufenden halten soll - und ich teilweise eben über eine zweite Meinung zu einer Überarbeitung froh wäre...
Ganz liebe Grüße und gute Nacht, --Anna reg (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Anna reg. You have new messages at LindsayH's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Europa-Rosarium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Lambert. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Detracted?

edit

"Detracted" (used by you) at Rosa Iceberg doesn't have the meaning in English that I think you intended. Perhaps you meant "retracted"? (Nice to see some work on these cultivar articles.) Peter coxhead (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are probably correct (English isn't my mother tongue) - what I'd like to say that the title was removed and it is only a "former ADR-rose". The strange thing is that I'm using it on commons since a few years and I'm quite sure that I didn't translate it from German myself... --Anna reg (talk) 10:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I understand. "Detracted" is only used in modern English with "from" and means "reduce the value of" applied to a positive quality. Thus you can write "Susceptibility to black spot detracts from the beauty of the rose". "Retracted" would be correct in the context, but is a bit formal; I ended up with "taken away" in "The German ADR title granted in 1960 was taken away in 2004."
(By the way, a very common English mistake made by German speakers is the wrong use of "since", which is not the same as that of "seit". "Since" can only be used with a fixed time point, e.g. "I've been using it since 2002" or "I've been doing it since 9 o'clock". "Since" is not used with a time span, when "for" is used, e.g. "I've been using it for a few years" or "I've been doing it for a few hours". Note the difference between "I've been using it for three years" (a time span) and "I've been using it since three years ago" (a time point). I'll pass over the very tricky problem of when to use the perfect progressive tense in English... You can see I used to teach linguistics! Ich bin mir sicher, dass Ihr Englisch ist besser als mein Deutsch!) Peter coxhead (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the explanation(s). The since/for mistake is one I am aware of, but I also make quite a lot of mistakes out of inattentiveness - especially when I'm changing what I'm writing mid-sentence (as was the case here). But I'm always glad when somebody checks my changes to articles... ;->
(Und dein Deutsch scheint ganz gut zu sei, aber du kannst mich gerne dutzen.) Regards, --Anna reg (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosa Peace may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The cultivar was hybridised in 1935, receiving the number 3-35-40 (the third hybridisation in 1935, and the 40th cultivar selected for test proliferation. As those

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosa 'Eden' may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • /> It can be grown as solitary shrub or in groups, in containers or as standard rose to 90 cm ((3 ft) high,<ref name=blv14>{{cite book |title=Das große BLV Handbuch Rosen |publisher=BLV |last1=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosa Peace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid tea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Anna reg. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Stub contest

edit

A quick note to say that as of this evening you've got 90 points - and there's three days still to go, so if you've any more to add please get them in soon :-). Thanks for the contributions! Andrew Gray (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  The Yorkshire Rose
To Anna reg, for all your expanding of rose stubs in the Stub Contest. Well done,Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Cas Liber! And thank you for organising the contest - it was a great possibility for me to know that I'm really destubbing those articles (at first, I wasn't sure when to remove the stub template). Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rose garden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guandong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Anna reg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Anna reg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply