Annonymousity

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Portuguese people. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 13:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC) Why aren't the Lusitanians being stated in the "Portuguese people"? But the moors? The Portuguese have no "moor" blood, since it was agaainst the Portuguese Christian state, foremost the English helped the Portuguese expel the moors out of the Ibera. Why are the "Italian people" and "Spanish people", refered as "The Moors", hence the fact, these invaders stood in Italian and Spanish territory for over 700 years, whilelist in Portugal only 300. The Portuguese are Lusitanians. Giving false statements or hiding them on wiki, only makes people belive in what they read.

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of American Mongrel

The article American Mongrel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research, relying on extremely biased and non-reliable sources. Clearly only here to promote a very unpleasant and specific point of view.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of American Mongrel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Mongrel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebirdlover (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)