Anomaly2002

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of bipolar disorder, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wes! • ^T_c 00:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Fuze

Hi Anomaly2002. I think Wes above made a good-faith mistake and thought you had inserted an edit that, in fact, you actually removed; it's an easy mistake to make when you're looking at diffs.

Anyway, I thought I'd let you know that I moved the "Fuze" article, about an obscure energy drink, to Fuze (beverage), and retargeted fuze itself to fuse (explosives), the primary meaning of the term, where the spelling differences are discussed. (Short summary: (a) everyone agrees that the thing they used to use in place of a circuit breaker is a "fuse" with an s, (b) the burning piece of string with gunpowder in it is usually "fuse" but occasionally "fuze", (c) the complicated triggering equipment inside bombs and grenades can also be spelled either way, but many sources use "fuze" distinctively for this equipment while spelling the burning string as "fuse".) From your edit summary (rv - Fuze /= Fuse) it's not clear to me whether you were attempting to make the distinction in part (c) or whether you wanted "Fuze" to mean the energy drink. If you want to make the distinction you should discuss it at talk:fuse (explosives). I would argue strongly against having fuze by itself point to the energy drink; the explosives meaning is immensely more prominent and widely used. --Trovatore 08:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Anomaly2002. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Anomaly2002. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Hungry Detective

The article The Hungry Detective has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)