Another Stickler

Ignore this test area

Folded up stuff test.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Archiving_a_talk_page Will it nest? The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. BASEPAGENAME = Another Stickler Yes, but how deep? The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Wikipedia:Introduction Special:Contributions/Another Stickler Wikipedia:Five pillars Wikipedia:Tutorial Wikipedia:How to edit a page Wikipedia:Article development Wikipedia:Manual of Style Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedia:Signatures Wikipedia:talk page (~~~~) Wikipedia:Questions user:greglocock curmudgeon user:Anna Lincoln greeter SoWhy guide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cutler prolific contributor user:TimVickers thinks he owns Evolution true false Anna Lincoln's talk page . For public help ask question and place {{helpme}} before the question. test You can use {{welcome}} or similar templates to welcome users yourself. Regards SoWhy 11:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC) All edits are tracked on Special:RecentChanges Special:Contributions/Another Stickler WP:WATCHLIST User talk:Anna Lincoln

Asking for help editing Driveshaft article

{{help}} Help. Please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Driveshaft and read my comments in the talk section "Drive shaft is two words". I need help from someone experienced, especially concerning the implications of reversing a redirect. I don't want to risk messing it up. Will you do it? Thank you in advance. -- Another Stickler (talk)

You need an admin to do it since you will want the page history to move correctly. I will see if I can find one. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 18:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Done Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 18:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Another Stickler (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Where do I submit suggestions for software changes to wikipedia?

{{help}} Thank you knowledgeable editors for reading this. To whom and where do I submit suggestions and/or bug reports for wiki software? I ask this because I want the lead section of all articles to be able to be edited with their own "edit" link, without people having to click "edit this page" and dragging the whole article into the editor. I tried calling the lead section of one article the "Intro" section so the "edit" link would appear, but this made the table of contents appear above anything else and made the article look unlike every other article. An editor after me undid my change and suggested that the MediaWiki developers would have to implement this to do it right. How do I contact them to get this going? -- Another Stickler (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Easy. Go to Special:Preferences. Under the 'Gadgets' tab, check the box marked 'Add an [edit] link for the lead section of a page'. Presto, you will see them on every page. The devs decided that people should be able to choose for themselves whether or not to see it. //roux   19:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tweak! Very cool. I'm set now. I'd still like to suggest that they make that the default. To whom do I send the suggestion? -- Another Stickler (talk) 20:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

The best place to go to gain consensus for a suggestion like that (the devs won't do anything without consensus) is the Village Pump. I'm curious as to why you think it should be the default, though. //roux   00:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I've mentioned it at the pump. It should be the default because it's better, and each new user shouldn't have to rediscover how to make it better. The "edit this page" link should be there for when the order of sections needs to be rearranged, or sections need to be split or joined, not as a way to edit the lead section. -- Another Stickler (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I noticed you are fairly new and have expressed interest in editing some music related articles. I thought I might encourage you to join some wikiprojects that you might be interested in. If you are not familiar with wikiprojects you can find more information here: Wikipedia:WikiProject. I personally am heavily involved in Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera and contribute every now and then to Wikipedia:WikiProject Composers and Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical Music. I am currently trying to recruit people for a new project Wikipedia:WikiProject Music Theory as wikipedia's articles in this area currently go largely un-noticed resulting in an overall lack of quality. (The music theory article itself needs a tremendous amount of work.) Wikiprojects are helpful as they bring together editors with common interests and provide systems to better monitor article quality. The projects also tend to attract professionals and/or well informed novices within a particular area. I myself have a Bachelors in Music Education and a Masters in Vocal Performance and Pedagogy. I hope to see you around at one of the projects.Nrswanson (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

OK. I added my name under Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music_Theory#Active_participants, assuming that was what was meant by "We would also be delighted if you signed on to the project (above)." What else should I do (other than editing)? -- Another Stickler (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome again ;-)

Project logo Welcome to the Music Theory Project!

Hello, Another Stickler! We're delighted you've signed up to join us! Music Theory is a new project and is currently in a formative stage. This is a great time to join the project as you can play an instrumental part in forming a new editing community within Wikipedia. We have a discussion page linked to the main project page where you signed in. We hope to create some more formalized efforts to encourage collaboraion on articles between editors soon. We look forward to working with you on the Music Theory Project. Please don't hesitate to ask us if you have any questions! We are always - here! Best regards!

Thanks for joining. We're a new project so right now we are working on setting up the project's structure. The set up requires a lot of house keeping which you may or may not be interested in working on. Basically we need to add our banner (Template:WikiProject Music Theory) to all of the talk pages of articles under the scope of our project, devise a quality assessment rubric (a more specific one to our project than the current generic one at Wikipedia:WikiProject Music Theory/Assessment), begin the process of assessing articles, review the current categories and stubs (do we like them, do we need others?), get search bots to help us identify newly created articles that may fall under our project, and recruit more editors. Assessment should ideally help us identify specifically what problems need to be addressed in each article. To show you examples of assessment systems see Wikipedia:WikiProject Composers/Assessment and Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Assessment. An example of an assessment would be at Talk:Thomas Arne and Talk:A Night at the Chinese Opera (click show on the opera banner). If you aren't interested in working on either of those that is fine. You could always add articles to the "articles of the month" and "Can you help?" sections to make editors aware of weak areas they can contribute to. Of course adding content to articles or creating new articles is always a good thing. The ultimate goal of the project is to help concentrate edits where they are most needed. I would like to eventually target four old articles every month that the group collectively works on to improve and four new articles we can create every month so that we are both improving quality and quantity at the same time. Once the set up is over the system should run mostly by itself and we can spend most of our time working on improving content where it is most needed. As more editors join the project talk page should also become more busy as people will be bringing ideas and questions there. You are one of the first members of the project so really you get to help make it whatever you want it to be. If you have any questions feel free to ask me.Nrswanson (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

persistent vandal

{{help}} While manually restoring the vandal-plagued inertia article, I came across this persistent vandal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/205.213.195.20 I'm not familiar enough with WP functions yet to try to stop this person. I'm hoping someone else can. Meanwhile, can someone semiprotect inertia? It has been vandalized by many different IPs, not just the one above, for at least 2 months straight (that's as far back as I've gotten in the history so far, but I'm guessing it's been happening since school started again here in the USA) and it is still continuing. -- Another Stickler (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

A user has to run up their warnings before they can be reported to AIV (in general). The vandal also has to be active when you are submitting the report, as blocks are not a punishment, but a preventative measure. The vandal has been offline for about 12 hours, so he should not be reported right now, and he is also only on his second warning. You should also note that the IP in question is in fact not a person, but a school, as shown at their talk page. If you do ever have any imminent problems that require reporting to administrators, go to WP:AIV and follow the instructions. Any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me! :) — neuro^(talk) 00:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and if you want a page protected, you can follow the instructions at WP:RFPP. Thanks! — neuro^(talk) 00:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary

Per Help:Edit summary#Use of edit summaries in disputes, "Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved." Hyacinth (talk) 08:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)