Ant sta

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I've looked back and there is a clean version from 2015 that I can restore. Note that it is not your article, it's our article about your organisation, see Wikipedia:Ownership of content.

It's clear that editors since May 2015 have been editing on behalf of the organisation, which is not permitted. Editors with a conflict of interest must declare it. If an editor works directly or indirectly for the organisation, or is otherwise are acting on its behalf, they are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question. If an editor is are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation they are writing about, they are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. They can post such a mandatory disclosure to their user page. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ant sta|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.

Note also that

• Editors must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management.
• References should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• Editors must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• Text copied from elsewhere cannot be used here. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

COI warning

Despite what I put at the top of the article, you have continued editing without formally declaring your conflict of interest. I haven't blocked you yet because your edits haven't been blatant spam and you haven't exactly concealed your COI. Nevertheless you must copy the following onto your user page exactly as it appears below and save it. {{paid|user=Ant sta|employer=Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education‎|client=}}.

Please do not ignore this warning Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Let me know

Jim, Let me know if I met the protocols.Ant sta (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)