Anticipatoryplagiarism

August 2024

Latest comment: 21 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your modification of the opening sentence did not conform to what cited source stated, so you hijacked the source. which follows specific tropes including smaller ensemble casts which struggle against the physical and psychological stresses of space travel is not endorsed by the source. Read WP:HIJACK.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

i undertsand you don't agree with my paraphrasing (admittedly of only the abstract) of the cited paper. not sure how you can determine what the author may 'endorse', but i see you created the article, and appreciate your deeper reading of the source material. in future i'll put my suggestions in the talk section first, in the hope i don't cause further kerfuffles! thanks again for taking the time to reply Anticipatoryplagiarism (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Riello (August 23)

Latest comment: 20 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft has many sources but they seem to be primary non-independent sources, or are primary such as press releases. To determine notability, WP needs secondary reliable sources, fully independent of the person, that provide significant coverage. Also the ALL CAPS style is not compliant with the Manual of Style, use upper case/lower case.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonio Riello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anticipatoryplagiarism! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Riello (August 30)

Latest comment: 13 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonio Riello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic