Anton321

Welcome!

Hello, Anton321, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Since you are signing on just now to wikipedia

It may help you to know that FA articles, and especially the leads of a long-established and carefully supervised article, are best edited by newcomers by their entering firstly the discussion on the talk page, engaging with experienced editors, and raising issues and making proposals there, so the community can weigh them on their merits. To do, as you have done, i.e., persist in making alterations to the page that show no regard for policy, and which ignores the advice given to you on the talk page after your first, manifestly ill-considered edits, is potentially disruptive. Nishidani (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Notice

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision. Your recent edits to the Shakespeare authorship question page that you made without discussion were unhelpful and have been reverted. Please discuss any suggested edits on the talk page before changing the text or images on the page. Tom Reedy (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)